2019
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronization transitions caused by time-varying coupling functions

Abstract: Interacting dynamical systems are widespread in nature. The influence that one such system exerts on another is described by a coupling function; and the coupling functions extracted from the time-series of interacting dynamical systems are often found to be time-varying. Although much effort has been devoted to the analysis of coupling functions, the influence of time-variability on the associated dynamics remains largely unexplored. Motivated especially by coupling functions in biology, including the cardior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different aspects of the cardiorespiratory interaction have been studied, including phase synchronization, coupling strength/directionality and the coupling functions (Rosenblum et al, 2002;Paluš and Stefanovska, 2003;Voss et al, 2008;Stankovski et al, 2012;Kralemann et al, 2013a;Hagos et al, 2019). The latter describe the functional mechanism of how the interactions occur and develop (Stankovski et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different aspects of the cardiorespiratory interaction have been studied, including phase synchronization, coupling strength/directionality and the coupling functions (Rosenblum et al, 2002;Paluš and Stefanovska, 2003;Voss et al, 2008;Stankovski et al, 2012;Kralemann et al, 2013a;Hagos et al, 2019). The latter describe the functional mechanism of how the interactions occur and develop (Stankovski et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DBI of the coupling functions was used to reconstruct a stochastic differential model, where the deterministic part was allowed to be time varying 20,21,50 . The model to be inferred is described by the following stochastic differential equation: 51 trueϕ˙1=ω1+q1ϕ1,ϕ2+ξ1ttrueϕ˙2=ω2+q2ϕ1,ϕ2+ξ2t.where ωi is the parameter of the natural frequency, and ϕi is the phase of oscillator i. The coupling function qiϕi,ϕσ describes the influence of oscillator σ on the phase of oscillator i.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this same results approximation can be seen at Monte Carlo calculations, but differing in terms of finding how the mathematical expectation of the not i.i.d. complex variables iterations and interactions of 𝑔(𝑥) might express as outcomes towards time and system own coupling functions dynamics [26], and thus not defining any visible weight to the probabilistic distributions oscillations (visible by a central limit theorem). This approach is, for example, different from the Tang [27] framework, that identifies weights and the correlation of the system with the central limit theorem, thus resembling the uniqueness concept of stability.…”
Section: Fig 3 Expression Frequency Of Interactions and Iterations On...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, this interactive system and probabilistic distributions share not only physical components within the coupling relations, but there are biological agents [26,28] that causes in many distinct aspects, influences over system functioning. In the view of modern scientific breakthrough, analyzing nonlinearity in the light of public administrative policy and infrastructure [29] are demands of investigations that can constitute a path to establish complex solutions for social systems that present nowadays high level of non-convergence and artificial oscillatory dynamics.…”
Section: Fig 3 Expression Frequency Of Interactions and Iterations On...mentioning
confidence: 99%