2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2012.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronized swimming: coordination of pelvic and pectoral fins during augmented punting by the freshwater stingray Potamotrygon orbignyi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the work on live animals has focused on sharks rather than batoids, perhaps owing to the fact that pelagic rays are generally difficult to maintain in laboratory settings and smaller benthic batoids often prefer to 'punt' (or walk) on the substrate rather than swim in the water column (Koester and Spirito, 2003;Macesic and Kajiura, 2010;Macesic and Summers, 2012;Macesic et al, 2013), making studies of free-swimming challenging to conduct. To date, only a few studies have attempted to quantify swimming kinematics of batoids (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the work on live animals has focused on sharks rather than batoids, perhaps owing to the fact that pelagic rays are generally difficult to maintain in laboratory settings and smaller benthic batoids often prefer to 'punt' (or walk) on the substrate rather than swim in the water column (Koester and Spirito, 2003;Macesic and Kajiura, 2010;Macesic and Summers, 2012;Macesic et al, 2013), making studies of free-swimming challenging to conduct. To date, only a few studies have attempted to quantify swimming kinematics of batoids (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this augmented feature, kinematics such as distance and speed per punt are not greater than in the true punters. The pectorals are likely generating thrust, thus reducing the amount of force experienced by the pelvic fins alone during a punt (Macesic et al, ). Moreover, several pelagic rays likely do not perform any form of punting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this species also uses the pectoral fins for swimming synchronously with the pelvic fins. Potamotrygon motoro uses the coordination of both pelvic and pectoral fins for locomotion, which was also observed in the augmented punter P. orbignyi (MACESIC et al 2013). Despite the fact that P. motoro travels faster than P. orbignyi, its velocity is comparable to true punters, but due to the synchronized use of pelvic and pectoral fins, P. motoro is considered an augmented punter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Despite the intermediate speed of augmented punting in P. orbignyi (0.26 DL/s) (MACESIC et al 2013), compared to slow synchronized pelvic movement (~0.20 DL/s, U. jamaicensis and D. sabina) and fast true punters (~0.40 DL/s, R. eglanteria and R. radula) (MACESIC & KAJIURA 2010, BILECENOGLU & EKSTROM 2013, P. motoro is fast (~0.43 DL/s), probably as a consequence of its foraging behavior to capture prey; the usual synchronized swimming is probably slower. The low distance traveled by P. motoro can possibly be explained by the abrupt cessation of locomotion to capture prey during feeding behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%