2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa.2017.0455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronous reluctance machine geometry optimisation through a genetic algorithm based technique

Abstract: In this study, the design optimisation of a synchronous reluctance machine for light electric vehicles is proposed, to increase efficiency and reduce torque ripples. The existing machine was structurally optimised, using dedicated genetic algorithms, replacing only the rotor and keeping the stator and it's winding untouched. Starting from the original design of the rotor implemented in Flux2D, a finite element analysis software, and the genetic algorithm optimisation implemented in Matlab, a complex co-simulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13 So we need an iterative scheme for decision making called optimization technique. Optimization is performed for each design using GA. To maximize the average torque and minimize the torque ripple, a general fitness function has been given based on Ruba et al 14 and Pellegrino et al 15 and is used in the following format:…”
Section: Methods Of Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 So we need an iterative scheme for decision making called optimization technique. Optimization is performed for each design using GA. To maximize the average torque and minimize the torque ripple, a general fitness function has been given based on Ruba et al 14 and Pellegrino et al 15 and is used in the following format:…”
Section: Methods Of Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So we need an iterative scheme for decision making called optimization technique. Optimization is performed for each design using GA. To maximize the average torque and minimize the torque ripple, a general fitness function has been given based on Ruba et al and Pellegrino et al and is used in the following format: italicFitness function0.12em()FF={}Tcal×()100truenormalΔT4/100normalΔT5%Tcal×()100truenormalΔT2/1005%<normalΔT10%Tcal×()100normalΔT/10010%<normalΔT20%Tcal×()100normalΔT/100normalΔT>20%. …”
Section: Overview Of Rotor Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost function is the function whose minimization prompts finding the finest values of its arguments . In this work, fitness function based on another literature is used in the following setup. 0.12emitalicFF={},Tcal×()100Titalicripple4/100Tripple5%Tcal×()100Titalicripple2/1005%<Tripple10%Tcal×()100Tripple/10010%<Tripple20%Tcal×()100Tripple/100Tripple>20%, where T cal and T ripple are calculated average torque and determined torque ripple, respectively.…”
Section: Rotor Structures—an Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, light models are successfully adopted in preliminary performance estimation in order to reduce the computational burden in the optimization steps [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%