2021
DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1107193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronous Versus Asynchronous: Pre-Service Teachers’ Performance in Science Formative Assessment Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the available literature, negligible differences in academic outcomes have commonly been observed between synchronous and asynchronous participation in lecture (Dorsah & Alhassan, 2021; Moridani, 2007; Olson, 2015). These studies, however, either failed to randomly assign participants into groups (Dorsah & Alhassan, 2021; Moridani, 2007) or allowed participants to switch groups (Olson, 2015). As such, random allocation was a crucial aspect of our study to reduce risk for selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within the available literature, negligible differences in academic outcomes have commonly been observed between synchronous and asynchronous participation in lecture (Dorsah & Alhassan, 2021; Moridani, 2007; Olson, 2015). These studies, however, either failed to randomly assign participants into groups (Dorsah & Alhassan, 2021; Moridani, 2007) or allowed participants to switch groups (Olson, 2015). As such, random allocation was a crucial aspect of our study to reduce risk for selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision was made to record a single lecture and test 3 days later to reduce potential for irregularities between groups as well as increase participant retention rates. Prior studies comparing synchronous to asynchronous delivery (Dorsah & Alhassan, 2021; Moridani, 2007; Olson, 2015) provided lectures over weeks or months, however, acknowledged differences in year of delivery (Moridani, 2007) or lack of participant follow‐up to allow for post‐testing (Olson, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education in Indonesia after pandemic situation by adapting online learning is currently facing various other challenges; where higher education needs to adapt to the learning situation in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic with various designs, strategies and online learning methods to encourage the growth of digital or online-based learning habits. This condition has become an educational phenomenon that has been widely researched by academics with various perspectives, starting from the perspective of educators (Dorsah & Alhassan, 2021;Istenič, 2021;Sudirtha & Widiartini, 2021;Wang et al, 2021), learners (Aque et al, 2021;Fuady et al, 2021;Sintema, 2020), as well as graduate user stakeholders (Carloni et al, 2021;Epps et al, 2021;Gupta et al, 2021). This learning pattern also seems to gain legitimacy from the pace of development of society which is continuously faced with globalization, advances in science and information technology which require learning designs and patterns to be adapted to these developments.…”
Section: Discussion a Post-pandemic Online Learning And Learning Mana...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the online learning variants, there are learning strategies with synchronous and asynchronous platforms. The meta-analysis study of the two synchronous and asynchronous variant entities focuses on discussing the technical side of the implementation of both variants (Bailey et al, 2021;Dorsah & Alhassan, 2021;Yadav et al, 2021). That is, synchronous learning techniques are interpreted based on the learning process that allows real-time communication between teachers and students at the same time by using learning technology, including video teleconference and satellite (Siddhpura & Siddpura, 2021).…”
Section: The Design Of Video-based Asynchronous Online Learning At Ma...mentioning
confidence: 99%