2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2021.102776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronous vs. non-synchronous imitation: Using dance to explore interpersonal coordination during observational learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third remark is that time‐delayed relationships (i.e., at lags other than 0) between perceived and kinematic coupling were for some analyses stronger than immediate relationships (i.e., at 0 lag), as shown in Supporting Information Figure A2 for both similarity and interaction; this can be clearly seen for horizontal imitation, where 4‐beat lag correlations are higher than those at 0‐beat lag. These results support the notion of nonsynchronous action mirroring (see Crone et al., 2021) and that observers paid attention to these aspects when rating Interaction. Further, they recall von Zimmermann, Vicary, Sperling, Orgs, and Richardson (2018) finding that distributed (time‐delayed) coordination rather than unitary coordination predicted group bonding between dancers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A third remark is that time‐delayed relationships (i.e., at lags other than 0) between perceived and kinematic coupling were for some analyses stronger than immediate relationships (i.e., at 0 lag), as shown in Supporting Information Figure A2 for both similarity and interaction; this can be clearly seen for horizontal imitation, where 4‐beat lag correlations are higher than those at 0‐beat lag. These results support the notion of nonsynchronous action mirroring (see Crone et al., 2021) and that observers paid attention to these aspects when rating Interaction. Further, they recall von Zimmermann, Vicary, Sperling, Orgs, and Richardson (2018) finding that distributed (time‐delayed) coordination rather than unitary coordination predicted group bonding between dancers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Synchrony, as a period locking spectrum, makes it possible to assess the relative contribution of different movement frequencies to dyadic coupling, helping to understand whether the dancers are mainly coupled through slow swaying, fast bouncing, or a combination thereof. Imitation, on the other hand, can help to identify leader–follower relationships or reciprocal exchanges of information; previous work has utilized similar features to quantify dance synchronization using parameterized (binarized) accounts of coupling between dancers (Crone et al., 2021), whereas our implementation is parameter‐free. The main methodological contribution of this study was to carry out a perceptual validation of these three features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third remark is that time-delayed relationships (i.e., at lags other than 0) between perceived and kinematic coupling were for some analyses stronger than immediate relationships (i.e., at 0 lag), as shown in Supplementary Figure A2 for both Similarity and Interaction; this can be clearly seen for horizontal Imitation, where 4-beat lag correlations are higher than those at 0-beat lag. These results support the notion of non-synchronous action mirroring (see Crone et al, 2021) and that observers paid attention to these aspects when rating Interaction. Further, they recall von Zimmerman et al's (2018) finding that distributed (time-delayed) coordination rather than unitary coordination predicted group bonding between dancers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Synchrony, as a period locking spectrum, makes it possible to assess the relative contribution of different movement frequencies to dyadic coupling, helping to understand whether the dancers are mainly coupled through slow swaying, fast bouncing, or a combination thereof. Imitation, on the other hand, can help to identify leader-follower relationships or reciprocal exchanges of information; previous work has utilized similar features to quantify dance synchronization using parameterized (binarized) accounts of coupling between dancers (Crone et al, 2021), whereas our implementation is parameter-free. The main methodological contribution of this study was to carry out a perceptual validation of these three features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both studies ,significantly more participants exceeded the pain threshold in the experimental group than in the control group. Although these and other observational learning studies do not clearly indicate how the time delay between observation and exposure shapes the learned response 18,33,48 , it is reasonable to hypothesize that real-time observation could enhance information retention 8 and thus increase the effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%