2017
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2016.2632441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronverter-Enabled DC Power Sharing Approach for LVDC Microgrids

Abstract: In a classical ac Micro-Grid (MG), a common frequency exists for coordinating active power sharing among droop-controlled sources. Like the frequency droop method, a voltage based droop approach has been employed to control the converters in dc MGs. However, voltage variation due to the droop gains and line resistances causes poor power sharing and voltage regulation in dc MG, which in most cases are solved by a secondary controller using a communication network. To avoid such an infrastructure and its accompa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, power management and load sharing approaches have been presented employing voltage droop method [18], [19] and frequency droop control [20], [21], where the load sharing among paralleled converters has been performed proportional to the corresponding rated powers. Furthermore, reference [22] presents another droop approach taking into account the power loss of converters and hence improving the overall system efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, power management and load sharing approaches have been presented employing voltage droop method [18], [19] and frequency droop control [20], [21], where the load sharing among paralleled converters has been performed proportional to the corresponding rated powers. Furthermore, reference [22] presents another droop approach taking into account the power loss of converters and hence improving the overall system efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the aforementioned challenges, different control schemes for DC microgrids are reported in [7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Commonly, these control schemes can be categorized as centralized and decentralized control [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In centralized schemes, the voltage of localized loads connected to a common bus or the voltage at the coupling point into the utility grid should be regulated [9], [10]. On the other hand, in decentralized methods, the average voltage of generator busses (busses with voltage source converter), is controlled [6], [7], [10]- [12], [16] In the centralized secondary approach, it is considered the loads are localized at a common buss and the secondary controller regulates the voltage of the common bus at a reference value. A central control unit measures the voltage of common buss and send the set point voltage to the voltage controlled converters [8]- [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in order to improve the system resiliency and reliability, a consensus protocol based secondary approaches are presented in [11], [17], where only the voltage of generation busses are communicating among the converters. Furthermore, a frequency droop based approach is also presented in [7], [16] in which the average voltage of generation busses can be properly regulated without utilizing any communication system. Furthermore, dc voltage in the dc MG is a local variable and voltage variation due to the feeder resistances at different points of MG is necessary in order to control the current flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%