Synchrony and Physiological Arousal Increase Cohesion and Cooperation in Large Naturalistic Groups

Abstract

Separate research streams have identified synchrony and arousal as two factors that might contribute to the effects of human rituals on social cohesion and cooperation. But no research has manipulated these variables in the field to investigate their causal – and potentially interactive – effects on prosocial behaviour. Across four experimental sessions involving large samples of strangers, we manipulated the synchronous and physiologically arousing affordances of a group marching task within a sports stadium. We observed participants’ subsequent movement, grouping, and cooperation via a camera hidden in the stadium’s roof. Synchrony and arousal both showed main effects, predicting larger groups, tighter clustering, and more cooperative behaviour in a free-rider dilemma. Synchrony and arousal also interacted on measures of clustering and cooperation such that synchrony only encouraged closer clustering—and encouraged greater cooperation—when paired with physiological arousal. The research helps us understand why synchrony and arousal often co-occur in rituals around the world. It also represents the first use of real-time spatial tracking as a precise and naturalistic method of simulating collective rituals.

Thinking through other minds: A variational approach to cognition and culture

“…The experiments described by Mouras show that empathy for others' pain can occur quickly once in-group conditions obtain, and that merely imagining fellow group members in pain affects sensorimotor processes with effects such as automatic (nonconscious) stiffening of posture. These findings echo recent studies on physiological correlates of group bonding that evince shared responses in both participants and spectators during high-arousal conditions of group synchrony, such as marching in a stadium (Jackson et al 2018) and ritual firewalking (Konvalinka et al 2011). Taken together, these studies point to an emerging sociophysiology that reveals some of the embodied interactions that undergird TTOM.…”

Social bonding, gestural complexity and displacement behaviour of wild chimpanzee

“…This property may draw attention of the recipients from the wider audience onto the signaller facilitating longer interactions such as travel or co-feeding. This finding supports research on humans (Jackson et al, 2018) showing that joint, high intensity behaviours have a role in social cohesion by being intensely rewarding to the dyad partners, regardless of the history of prior interaction.…”

Dying for the group: Towards a general theory of extreme self-sacrifice

“…Those forms of communal sharing mentioned by Thomsen and Fiske that do not fit with our imagistic-pathway-to-fusion model would nevertheless seem to fit well with our shared biology pathway, insofar as they emphasize bonds of kinship via nursing, feeding, commensalism, and so on (Vázquez et al 2017). The main exception to this is social synchrony, which the pathways-tofusion framework also encompasses (Jackson et al 2018;Reddish et al 2016), but in a model leading to state fusion rather than trait fusion . State fusion results from a temporarily elevated experience of shared essence, which, in the case of social synchrony, appears to be prompted by the illusion that one's agency and that of the group are combined (Reddish et al, in preparation).…”