Synchrony and Process: Editing Manuscript Miscellanies

Abstract

This essay argues that editors of informal early modern manuscript miscellanies should place greater emphasis on the discontinuities in miscellany construction. Manuscript miscellanies are often the products of discrete phases of composition, collection, and transcription, combining distinct thematic and generic sections in complex but analyzable ways, rather than authorially unified collections comparable to sonnet sequences. The argument is illustrated by an analysis of points at which Jean Klene’s RETS edition of Anne Southwell’s miscellany elides textual discontinu ity, and the essay concludes with some suggestions about ways in which future editions of manuscript miscellanies, both electronic and hard copy, might better reflect the complex structures of their copy texts.

Death and Transmediations: Manuscripts in the Age of Hypertext

“…Manuscripts published as printed scholarly editions are usually coherent narratives based on elements synchronously bound to the authorial work, hiding a) the curation process of collecting and relating the different parts of a manuscript, and b) the nonlinearity and asynchronicity of the authorial work [20]. For instance, manuscripts can be physically "bound", e.g., in a volume but not necessarily logically connected.…”