“…This time expanded and displaced rock art studies focused mainly on images analyses to a greater interest on the characterization of their location, their material composition, and dating, and contribute to offering new interpretations of art based on its relations with socio-cultural and historicalrelated processes, and their association with thems such as social identity, gender, and shamanism, among others (Conkey and Hastorf, 1990;Bahn, 1994;Chippindale and Tacon, 1999;Withley, 1999;Sanz et al, 2009;McDonald and Veth, 2012;Sanz and Fiore, 2014). This movement implied the introduction and application of new methodological techniques, parallel to the technical advancement observed in other disciplines, such as mapping techniques and Geographical Information System (GIS) (Wienhold and Robinson, 2017), digitalization of rock art records (Brady et al, 2017), analysis of images with specific informatics programs (Cerrillo-Cuenca and Sepúlveda, 2015), and the implementation of systematic physicochemical analyses, between others (Clottes et al, 1990;Rowe, 2001;Chalmin et al, 2003;Reiche and Chalmin, 2014;Bonneau et al, 2012;Huntley and Freeman, 2016;Tomasini et al, 2016;Chalmin and Huntley, 2017;). Like what happened in other archaeology-related areas, the collection of new complementary data at different scales broadened our understanding of the painted and engraved rock art representations.…”