2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchrotron X-ray radiography studies of pitting corrosion of stainless steel: Extraction of pit propagation parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
63
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
11
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of factors were suggested to influence the gradient of pit growth, such as the area of perforation of the metal lacy covers, chloride concentration, applied potential, type of electrolyte and temperature, as well as pit growth direction, with respect to the sample position. 7,9,14,21,[35][36][37][38] For example, a difference of 15% was reported between pit growth with the sample facing upwards versus downwards in 2-D. 7 In our study, all pits grew vertical at the wire, and minor differences in diffusivity parameters estimated for pits 2 and 3 may even be a result of the difference in perforated area of both pit covers. 9 If the diffusion coefficient (D) is assumed to be constant at 0.85 × 10 −5 cm 2 .s −1 , 9,19 the mean metal salt concentration inside the pits can be estimated from the diffusivity parameters given above.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A number of factors were suggested to influence the gradient of pit growth, such as the area of perforation of the metal lacy covers, chloride concentration, applied potential, type of electrolyte and temperature, as well as pit growth direction, with respect to the sample position. 7,9,14,21,[35][36][37][38] For example, a difference of 15% was reported between pit growth with the sample facing upwards versus downwards in 2-D. 7 In our study, all pits grew vertical at the wire, and minor differences in diffusivity parameters estimated for pits 2 and 3 may even be a result of the difference in perforated area of both pit covers. 9 If the diffusion coefficient (D) is assumed to be constant at 0.85 × 10 −5 cm 2 .s −1 , 9,19 the mean metal salt concentration inside the pits can be estimated from the diffusivity parameters given above.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…4 An undercutting mechanism was suggested for pit growth at high electrochemical potentials, leading to the development of dish shaped pits covered by metal lacy covers. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Pit propagation is controlled by diffusion of species through the salt film at the inner surface of pits. A high anodic dissolution rate, which facilitate critical ion concentrations inside a pit, is the criterion for pits to propagate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From pit depth measurements, it has already been shown that the current density at the pit bottom can be calculated [29]. Indeed, there is a constant current density at the bottom of the pit as it was recently found by quantifying the variation of local current density around the perimeter of the pit using X-Ray radiography [19]. Fig.…”
Section: Discrimination Between Diffusion and Ohmic Control For The Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Pits on stainless steel grow by undercutting of the passive metal surface. The upward growth of lateral lobes perforates the metal surface and produces metal particles leaving a porous cover known as a 'lacy cover'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%