“…4a,b In this paper, we thus wish to introduce our results concerning the effect of both the cyclopentadienyl and the anionic donor ligands in syndiospecific styrene polymerization with a series of nonbridged half-titanocenes of the type Cp′TiCl 2 (L) [L ) O-2,6-i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 , Cp′ ) Cp (1), 1,3-Me 2 C 5 H 3 (2), 1,2,4-Me 3 C 5 H 2 (3), C 5 Me 5 (Cp*, 4); Cp′ ) Cp*, L ) OPh (5), O-4-MeC 6 H 4 (6), O-2,6-Me 2 C 6 H 3 (7), O-2,6-t Bu 2 C 6 H 3 (8); Cp′ ) 1,3-Me 2 C 5 H 3 , L ) NMeCy (9), N(2,6-Me 2 C 6 H 3 )(SiMe 3 ) (10), Chart 1] in the presence of methylaluminoxane (MAO). [18][19][20][21] Since we recently communicated that (tert-BuC 5 H 4 )TiMe 2 (OAr) (11, OAr ) O-2,6-i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 ) was effective for syndiospecific polymerization of styrene in the presence of a mixture of Al(n-C 8 H 17 )/Al i Bu 3 and Ph 3 CB(C 6 F 5 ) 4 , 22 we explored the role of both the cyclopentadienyl and the aryloxide ligands in this catalysis. Table 1 summarizes the results for styrene polymerization with a series of Cp′TiCl 2 (O-2,6-i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 ) (1-4) and Cp′TiCl 3 [Cp′ ) Cp (1′), 1,3-Me 2 C 5 H 3 (2′), 1,2,4-Me 3 C 5 H 2 (3′), C 5 Me 5 (4′)] complexes in the presence of MAO at various temperatures.…”