2009
DOI: 10.1002/pola.23226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syndiotactic‐specific radical polymerization of N,N‐dimethylacrylamide in the presence of tartrates: A proposed mechanism for the polymerization

Abstract: Radical polymerization of N,N‐dimethylacrylamide (DMAAm) was investigated in the presence of tartrates, such as diethyl L‐tartrate, diisopropyl L‐tartrate, and di‐n‐butyl L‐tartrate, in toluene at low temperatures. Syndiotactic polymers were obtained in the presence of tartrates, whereas isotactic polymers were obtained in the absence of tartrates. The syndiotactic‐specificity increased with increasing amount of tartrates and with decreasing polymerization temperature. NMR analysis suggested that DMAAm and tar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
19
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
19
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…S6 †). The r diad content reached up to 65% in THF, which is comparable to the highest r diad content of 69% reported to date for radically prepared poly (DMAAm)s. 58 On the other hand, LiOTf exhibited a different effect to that of LiNTf 2 and LiCl, in that it gave syndiotactic-Scheme 2 Relationship between the stoichiometry of the DMAAm-Li + complex and the stereospecificity of the DMAAm polymerization. In contrast, LiCl induced syndiotactic specificity in CH 3 CN and THF, whereas LiNTf 2 induced isotactic specificity under the same conditions (Table 3, runs 21 and 23).…”
Section: Relationship Between Complex Structure and Stereospecificitymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…S6 †). The r diad content reached up to 65% in THF, which is comparable to the highest r diad content of 69% reported to date for radically prepared poly (DMAAm)s. 58 On the other hand, LiOTf exhibited a different effect to that of LiNTf 2 and LiCl, in that it gave syndiotactic-Scheme 2 Relationship between the stoichiometry of the DMAAm-Li + complex and the stereospecificity of the DMAAm polymerization. In contrast, LiCl induced syndiotactic specificity in CH 3 CN and THF, whereas LiNTf 2 induced isotactic specificity under the same conditions (Table 3, runs 21 and 23).…”
Section: Relationship Between Complex Structure and Stereospecificitymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Hirano et al . 27–29 proposed a mechanism for the syndiotactic‐specific radical polymerization of poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) in the presence of hexamethylphosphoramide. This mechanism was adapted to explain the influence of AES on the PMMA tacticity (Figure 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, steric hindrance of the AES would limit approach via pathway “b” of the next incoming monomer. As a result, syndiotactic‐specificity was induced 27…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have reported that radical polymerization of vinyl monomers with amide groups, such as acrylamide derivatives and N ‐vinylacetamide, can be moderately well controlled by utilizing hydrogen bonding interaction 2–8. For example, complex formation of N ‐isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm) with hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA) or alkyl alcohol (ROH) such as 3‐methyl‐3‐pentanol (3Me3PenOH) gave syndiotactic polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%