2008 IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iswcs.2008.4726115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syndrome based block decoding of convolutional codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, upon increasing the number of iterations or SNR, the syndrome exhibits longer sequences of zeros, which indicates error-free transmission. This fact can be exploited to partition the received block into error-free and erroneous segments, as proposed in [4], [5]. This is achieved by heuristically choosing a design parameter, L min = (L start + L end + 1), which is the minimum number of consecutive zero syndromes after which the subblock is deemed to be error-free.…”
Section: Syndrome-based Blockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, upon increasing the number of iterations or SNR, the syndrome exhibits longer sequences of zeros, which indicates error-free transmission. This fact can be exploited to partition the received block into error-free and erroneous segments, as proposed in [4], [5]. This is achieved by heuristically choosing a design parameter, L min = (L start + L end + 1), which is the minimum number of consecutive zero syndromes after which the subblock is deemed to be error-free.…”
Section: Syndrome-based Blockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L start = (L min − 1)/2 symbols are appended to the following erroneous block [4], [5]. Only the remaining (L 0 − L min + 1) symbols are considered error-free.…”
Section: Syndrome-based Blockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this work another approach to adaptive decoding, based on the block syndrome decoder (BSD), which was previously considered for efficient parallel decoding [4], is presented. Compared to the T-algorithm, this approach can reduce its effort to almost zero in the best case and can use a standard implementation of the VA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%