2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion associated with an ovarian immature teratoma: A case report and review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can cause both hypernatremia secondary to central diabetes insipidus ( 18 ) or hyponatremia due to SIAD. To our knowledge, only two examples of CCA are currently reported in the literature as a cause of SIAD ( 22 , 23 ), while seven cases of teratoma have been associated with SIAD (most of them improved after surgery) ( 49 ). Although we are aware that we cannot fully exclude the teratoma as a cause of anti-diuretic hormone hypersecretion (surgical removal was not performed, and a pathology report is not available), we believe that it can be hardly considered as the cause of SIAD in our patient, since only cases of immature ovarian teratoma associated with SIAD are reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can cause both hypernatremia secondary to central diabetes insipidus ( 18 ) or hyponatremia due to SIAD. To our knowledge, only two examples of CCA are currently reported in the literature as a cause of SIAD ( 22 , 23 ), while seven cases of teratoma have been associated with SIAD (most of them improved after surgery) ( 49 ). Although we are aware that we cannot fully exclude the teratoma as a cause of anti-diuretic hormone hypersecretion (surgical removal was not performed, and a pathology report is not available), we believe that it can be hardly considered as the cause of SIAD in our patient, since only cases of immature ovarian teratoma associated with SIAD are reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%