2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergetic interfacial adsorption of protein and low-molecular-weight emulsifiers in aerated emulsions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As may be observed in Figure 1, both control Es exhibited a monomodal distribution with a mainly large-sized population (around 1.4 µm), which was narrower and better defined in the case of E-SC-C, likely reflecting a more stable emulsion. Similar results were observed by Jiang et al [22] in caseinate-based emulsions elaborated with increasing low molecular weight emulsifier concentrations, but exhibiting a bimodal size distribution at a concentration below 0.25% w/w. These findings indicate that in control Es, both EPs, SC and WPI, were adequately adsorbed onto the droplets' surface, forming an interfacial membrane through repulsive strong interactions (e.g., steric and electrostatic interactions) between oil droplets, which are resistant to rupture [8,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As may be observed in Figure 1, both control Es exhibited a monomodal distribution with a mainly large-sized population (around 1.4 µm), which was narrower and better defined in the case of E-SC-C, likely reflecting a more stable emulsion. Similar results were observed by Jiang et al [22] in caseinate-based emulsions elaborated with increasing low molecular weight emulsifier concentrations, but exhibiting a bimodal size distribution at a concentration below 0.25% w/w. These findings indicate that in control Es, both EPs, SC and WPI, were adequately adsorbed onto the droplets' surface, forming an interfacial membrane through repulsive strong interactions (e.g., steric and electrostatic interactions) between oil droplets, which are resistant to rupture [8,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the emulsion E-WPI-T became more viscous, showing the highest resistance to flow and the highest shear stress value over the complete shear rate range studied, and even with an apparent and measurable initial yield stress at~3 Pa, indicating plastic behavior. E-WPI-T also had apparent viscosity values similar to those reported by Jiang et al [22] in caseinate-based Es stabilized with low molecular weight emulsifiers. On the contrary, small differences can be observed between the flow curves of E-SC-C, E-SC-T and E-WPI-C samples, mainly at the highest shear rates.…”
Section: Steady Shear Rheological Properties Of Essupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, among hydrophilic surfactants, Tween (polysorbate) and Span (sorbitan) series are the most used. As surfactants adsorb to the interface, these molecules lower emulsions' interfacial tension, keeping a smooth surface and preventing coalescence of droplets (Jiang et al, 2018). Thus, the HLB value of surfactants, coupled with shear stress conditions, needs to be carefully selected to achieve long-term stable W 1 /O/W 2 emulsion systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%