2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-69166-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergies and Trade-Offs Among Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity in Different Forest Types Inside and Off-Reserve in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was not equally distributed among the different forest type covers, mainly due to accessibility, which was identified as the main trade-off for field surveys in other studies in Patagonia [83]. The under-sampled areas were located in the mountain (west) and peatland (east) areas, where no economic activities were conducted [84], and included the less profitable species in terms of monetary values (e.g., timber or silvopastoral) [50,68,73]. These limitations must be considered when the models are used and must be tested in future research to improve the proposed models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, it was not equally distributed among the different forest type covers, mainly due to accessibility, which was identified as the main trade-off for field surveys in other studies in Patagonia [83]. The under-sampled areas were located in the mountain (west) and peatland (east) areas, where no economic activities were conducted [84], and included the less profitable species in terms of monetary values (e.g., timber or silvopastoral) [50,68,73]. These limitations must be considered when the models are used and must be tested in future research to improve the proposed models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, an ecosystem service-based framework for the sustainable management of the natural ecosystems of Patagonia is being promoted, and several planning proposals were developed for the region considering the synergies and trade-offs with biodiversity (Peri et al 2021). For example, most of the forest planning at Southern Patagonia (Argentina) were based on provisioning ecosystem services despite the trade-offs with other activities (e.g., tourism or recreation) (Carrasco et al 2021).…”
Section: Silvicultural Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%