2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06820-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergism of citric acid and zero-valent iron on Cr(VI) removal from real contaminated soil by electrokinetic remediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From th left side of Figure 2, it is obvious that the addition of CA contributes to enhance the re moval efficiency compared to the HCl control group, and the highest removal rate was up to 87% at pH 4. This result further confirms that the metal chelation produced by CA i greater than the resolution of H + at a certain concentration, thereby facilitating the remova of Cd 2+ [37]. As for pH, the pH of all the samples increased after the reaction as shown in the right part of Figure 2, and the pH of the HCl control group was slightly higher than that of the CA group [38].…”
Section: Effect Of Ca On the Removal Of CD 2+ From Water By Modified Nzvi Under Different Phsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…From th left side of Figure 2, it is obvious that the addition of CA contributes to enhance the re moval efficiency compared to the HCl control group, and the highest removal rate was up to 87% at pH 4. This result further confirms that the metal chelation produced by CA i greater than the resolution of H + at a certain concentration, thereby facilitating the remova of Cd 2+ [37]. As for pH, the pH of all the samples increased after the reaction as shown in the right part of Figure 2, and the pH of the HCl control group was slightly higher than that of the CA group [38].…”
Section: Effect Of Ca On the Removal Of CD 2+ From Water By Modified Nzvi Under Different Phsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This is a major concern because the oxidized hexavalent form, Cr(VI), has a higher toxicity than the reduced, mostly immobile, trivalent form, Cr(III). Many in situ remediation technologies have been developed and applied in Cr(VI)‐contaminated groundwater sites, such as the use of permeable reactive (reductive) barriers (Wilkin et al 2005), application(s) of strong abiotic reductants to reduce and remove Cr(VI) from solution via precipitation (Vermeul et al 2004; Dresel et al 2008; Zhong et al 2009), bioreduction, phytoremediation (Shams et al 2010; Zheng et al 2020), and natural attenuation (Last et al 2015; Truex et al 2015). However, remediation of Cr‐contaminated sites remains challenging mainly because of the heterogeneity of subsurface Cr contamination; the occurrence of a variety of Cr‐containing phases that exhibit difficult‐to‐predict geochemical behavior; the presence of other redox‐sensitive co‐contaminants as part of a complex contaminant mixture; and the existence of hard‐to‐access subsurface locations, or concentrated vadose zone Cr hot spots, that serve as a continuous source of groundwater (GW) contamination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several accepted methods for removing Cr­(VI), which typically exists as highly soluble and toxic chromate anions (HCrO 4 – or Cr 2 O 7 2– ), from industrial wastewater: photocatalytic reduction, , chemical precipitation, electrokinetic remediation, membrane filtration, , and adsorption. Among these methods, adsorption is especially appealing, as it is very effective at removing Cr­(VI) . The adsorption process requires a solid surface (i.e., an adsorbent) with a large surface area for the species to be adsorbed (i.e., an adsorbate) to attach to, either by physical or chemical processes, for which in here, the use of a nanosized material will be beneficial for providing the surface area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several accepted methods for removing Cr(VI), which typically exists as highly soluble and toxic chromate anions (HCrO 4 − or Cr 2 O 7 2− ), from industrial wastewater: photocatalytic reduction, 6,8−10 chemical precipitation, 11 electrokinetic remediation, 12 membrane filtration, 13,14 and adsorption. 15−17 Among these methods, adsorption is especially appealing, as it is very effective at removing Cr(VI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%