2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergistic interfacial engineering of a S-scheme ZnO/In2S3 photocatalyst with S−O covalent bonds: A dual-functional advancement for tetracycline hydrochloride degradation and H2 evolution

Yating Ai,
Jiajie Hu,
Xianqiang Xiong
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface potential of NiCo-OH (47.48 mV) is higher than that of NiCoS (27.94 mV) (as shown in Figure 3e and 3f), which indicates that the Fermi energy level of NiCo-OH is higher than that of NiCoS. 44 Based on the measured UV−vis absorption spectra of NiCo-OH and NiCoS (Figure S15a,b), (αhν) 2 was plotted versus the photon energy (hν) using the Kubelka−Munk method (both NiCo-OH and NiCoS are direct bandgap semiconductors). 45 By extrapolating the plots to (αhν) 2 = 0, the bandgap (E g ) values of NiCo-OH and NiCoS are estimated to be 2.89 and 2.77 eV (Figure S15c,d), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surface potential of NiCo-OH (47.48 mV) is higher than that of NiCoS (27.94 mV) (as shown in Figure 3e and 3f), which indicates that the Fermi energy level of NiCo-OH is higher than that of NiCoS. 44 Based on the measured UV−vis absorption spectra of NiCo-OH and NiCoS (Figure S15a,b), (αhν) 2 was plotted versus the photon energy (hν) using the Kubelka−Munk method (both NiCo-OH and NiCoS are direct bandgap semiconductors). 45 By extrapolating the plots to (αhν) 2 = 0, the bandgap (E g ) values of NiCo-OH and NiCoS are estimated to be 2.89 and 2.77 eV (Figure S15c,d), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The surface potentials of the samples were investigated by Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM). The surface potential of NiCo-OH (47.48 mV) is higher than that of NiCoS (27.94 mV) (as shown in Figure e and f), which indicates that the Fermi energy level of NiCo-OH is higher than that of NiCoS . Based on the measured UV–vis absorption spectra of NiCo-OH and NiCoS (Figure S15a,b), (α h ν) 2 was plotted versus the photon energy ( h ν) using the Kubelka–Munk method (both NiCo-OH and NiCoS are direct bandgap semiconductors) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…By analysing the intercept of the tangent line on the X axis, the flat band potential (Efb) of MIL-100(Fe) was calculated to be −0.60 V (vs. SCE). According to the equation E(vs. NHE) = E(vs. SCE) + 0.051pH + 0.24 [45][46][47], the flat band (Efb) was 0.083 (vs. NHE). The Mott-Schottky curve of MIL-100(Fe) showed a negative tangent slope indicating the presence of an n-type semiconductor.…”
Section: Degradation Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 95%