2020
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2020.2990373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergistic Use of Remote Sensing and Modeling for Estimating Net Primary Productivity in the Red Sea With VGPM, Eppley-VGPM, and CbPM Models Intercomparison

Abstract: Primary Productivity (PP) has been recently investigated using remote sensing based models over quite limited geographical areas of the Red Sea. This work sheds light on how phytoplankton and primary production would react to the effects of global warming in the extreme environment of the Red Sea and, hence, illuminates how similar regions may behave in the context of climate variability. Our study focuses on using satellite observations to conduct an intercomparison of three net primary production (NPP) model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seasonal pattern of NPP in the Mediterranean Sea is considered to be generally high in winter and low in summer, consistent with the algal biomass in the west and the influence of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in the east (Bosc et al, 2004). In the Red Sea, NPP is regionally distinct and regulated by environmental factors such as sea surface temperature (SST), mixed layer depth (MLD), and PAR (Li W et al, 2020). Nutrient supply has been shown to be the main regulator of NPP in eastern boundary upwelling regions (Messieá nd Chavez, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The seasonal pattern of NPP in the Mediterranean Sea is considered to be generally high in winter and low in summer, consistent with the algal biomass in the west and the influence of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in the east (Bosc et al, 2004). In the Red Sea, NPP is regionally distinct and regulated by environmental factors such as sea surface temperature (SST), mixed layer depth (MLD), and PAR (Li W et al, 2020). Nutrient supply has been shown to be the main regulator of NPP in eastern boundary upwelling regions (Messieá nd Chavez, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Performance assessment of the P b opt , DIPP and DRPP models was done based on the most common statistical metrics such as mean relative error (MRE), Pearson-correlation coefficient (PCC), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean net bias (MNB) [33], [61]. These metrics are defined as…”
Section: Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are classified based on the complexity and integration level with wavelength, time and depth. According to the input parameters, the satellite-based NPP models are classified as: i) chlorophyllbased models, ii) carbon-based models, and iii) phytoplankton absorption-based models [32], [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pearson correlation analysis was used to measures the statistical relationship between PP and chl-a, SST ONI, MEI, and further to evaluate the impact of ENSO on the distribution and variability of PP. Pearson correlation coefficient (𝑟) in the range from −1 (anti-correlation) to +1 (perfect correlation), between these two monthly time series x and y, with N elements as equation 3 [9]:…”
Section: Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional shipbased in situ measurements are limited in their ability to capture PP large scale spatial and temporal dynamics and are time-consuming and expensive [7,8]. While remote sensing data can use to observe the dynamics of the ocean surface, providing fundamental means for estimating oceanic PP on large spatiotemporal scales [9]. One of the essential applications of ocean colour data has been in the PP computation at large scales, using remotely sensed fields of phytoplankton biomass [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%