“…Distinguished from other Leptanillomorpha by the following likely autapomorphies (see Boudinot 2015 for male Martialis, Griebenow 2020, 2021 for Leptanillini, and Yamada et al 2020 for precise morphological depictions of Opamyrma) : (h) female mandibular teeth distinct in form, with a pointed apical tooth and a subrhomboidal and proximally directed subapical tooth, with these subtended by fine serration (vs. teeth spiniform and widely spaced [M] and teeth subtriangular and roughly equal in size [L], with [some L] or without [other L] teeth on the basal margin); (i) female mandible with a single median traction chaeta (vs. chaetae absent [M] or multiple [L]); (j) male antennal toruli situated distant from posterior clypeal margin (vs. toruli contacting or very nearly clypeus); (k) female occiput grossly enlarged such that it is distinctly visible behind the occipital carina in full-face view; (l) female petiole elongate, sessile and subrectangular, length ∼ 2 x width, excluding anterior and posterior constrictions (vs. petiole shorter [L, except for the bizarrely elongated, tubular condition in Yavnella laventa Griebenow et al ., submitted] or pedunculate [M]); (m) female petiolar sternum extremely long and narrow, vase-like in ventral view (vs. sternum shorter, wider, or with tergosternal fusion rendering abdominal sternum II undelimited laterally); (n) female abdominal segment III de-petiolated, i.e. , posterior margins not constricted, postsclerites tube-like (vs. AIII partially [M] to completely petiolated [L]; AIII is completely petiolate in workers and some queens of Leptanillini, with exceptional occurrence among certain Protanilla males, e.g.…”