2021
DOI: 10.1071/is20059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synonymisation of the male-based ant genus

Abstract: Although molecular data have proven indispensable in confidently resolving the phylogeny of many clades across the tree of life, these data may be inaccessible for certain taxa. The resolution of taxonomy in the ant subfamily Leptanillinae is made problematic by the absence of DNA sequence data for leptanilline taxa that are known only from male specimens, including the monotypic genus Phaulomyrma Wheeler & Wheeler. Focusing upon the considerable diversity of undescribed male leptanilline morphospecies… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distinguished from other Leptanillomorpha by the following likely autapomorphies (see Boudinot 2015 for male Martialis, Griebenow 2020, 2021 for Leptanillini, and Yamada et al 2020 for precise morphological depictions of Opamyrma) : (h) female mandibular teeth distinct in form, with a pointed apical tooth and a subrhomboidal and proximally directed subapical tooth, with these subtended by fine serration (vs. teeth spiniform and widely spaced [M] and teeth subtriangular and roughly equal in size [L], with [some L] or without [other L] teeth on the basal margin); (i) female mandible with a single median traction chaeta (vs. chaetae absent [M] or multiple [L]); (j) male antennal toruli situated distant from posterior clypeal margin (vs. toruli contacting or very nearly clypeus); (k) female occiput grossly enlarged such that it is distinctly visible behind the occipital carina in full-face view; (l) female petiole elongate, sessile and subrectangular, length ∼ 2 x width, excluding anterior and posterior constrictions (vs. petiole shorter [L, except for the bizarrely elongated, tubular condition in Yavnella laventa Griebenow et al ., submitted] or pedunculate [M]); (m) female petiolar sternum extremely long and narrow, vase-like in ventral view (vs. sternum shorter, wider, or with tergosternal fusion rendering abdominal sternum II undelimited laterally); (n) female abdominal segment III de-petiolated, i.e. , posterior margins not constricted, postsclerites tube-like (vs. AIII partially [M] to completely petiolated [L]; AIII is completely petiolate in workers and some queens of Leptanillini, with exceptional occurrence among certain Protanilla males, e.g.…”
Section: Transformation Series From Aculeata Into Formicoideamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Distinguished from other Leptanillomorpha by the following likely autapomorphies (see Boudinot 2015 for male Martialis, Griebenow 2020, 2021 for Leptanillini, and Yamada et al 2020 for precise morphological depictions of Opamyrma) : (h) female mandibular teeth distinct in form, with a pointed apical tooth and a subrhomboidal and proximally directed subapical tooth, with these subtended by fine serration (vs. teeth spiniform and widely spaced [M] and teeth subtriangular and roughly equal in size [L], with [some L] or without [other L] teeth on the basal margin); (i) female mandible with a single median traction chaeta (vs. chaetae absent [M] or multiple [L]); (j) male antennal toruli situated distant from posterior clypeal margin (vs. toruli contacting or very nearly clypeus); (k) female occiput grossly enlarged such that it is distinctly visible behind the occipital carina in full-face view; (l) female petiole elongate, sessile and subrectangular, length ∼ 2 x width, excluding anterior and posterior constrictions (vs. petiole shorter [L, except for the bizarrely elongated, tubular condition in Yavnella laventa Griebenow et al ., submitted] or pedunculate [M]); (m) female petiolar sternum extremely long and narrow, vase-like in ventral view (vs. sternum shorter, wider, or with tergosternal fusion rendering abdominal sternum II undelimited laterally); (n) female abdominal segment III de-petiolated, i.e. , posterior margins not constricted, postsclerites tube-like (vs. AIII partially [M] to completely petiolated [L]; AIII is completely petiolate in workers and some queens of Leptanillini, with exceptional occurrence among certain Protanilla males, e.g.…”
Section: Transformation Series From Aculeata Into Formicoideamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we synonymize Anomalomyrmini Taylor, 1990 with Leptanillini, 1910 syn. nov. based on consideration of worker and male morphology contextualized by phylogenomic inference (Griebenow 2020, 2021). To maintain reciprocally monophyletic genera that are diagnosable based on all adult castes Anomalomyrma and Protanilla will soon be synonymized, while all genera within the tribe Leptanillini will be subsumed into one (Griebenow, in prep.…”
Section: Transformation Series From Aculeata Into Formicoideamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus is most diverse in mainland South-east Asia (this diversity remaining entirely undescribed), with additional representatives in the Indian subcontinent and the Arabian subcontinent as far south as Yemen (Collingwood and Agosti 1996). Borowiec et al (2019) also robustly recovered this clade, under a sampling regime overlapping with Griebenow (2020Griebenow ( , 2021, although Borowiec et al (2019) did not explicitly identify this clade as Yavnella.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Owing to collecting bias towards males, three genera in the tribe Leptanillini have been described solely from male specimens, as have some species of Leptanilla. Further, there is a large diversity of undescribed male morphospecies in the subfamily (Griebenow 2021). The Leptanillinae are therefore afflicted by parallel taxonomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation