“…Remotely sensed observations of the Earth have provided critical inputs for global carbon cycle studies, provided observation‐based GPP estimates for comparisons with Earth System Models and terrestrial carbon cycle models, and have revolutionized our understanding of the carbon cycle (Anav et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2017; Cramer et al., 1999; Field et al., 1995; Jung et al., 2020; Keenan et al., 2012; O’Sullivan et al., 2020; Prince & Goward, 1995; Ruimy et al., 1996; Running et al., 2004; Xiao et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2016; Zscheischler et al., 2014). The diurnal to interannual variability of GPP is determined by limiting resources, climate, weather conditions, disturbance, phenology, and extreme events (Beer et al., 2010; Gu et al., 2002; Kannenberg et al., 2020; Randazzo et al., 2020; Roby et al., 2020; Stoy et al., 2005; Zscheischler et al., 2014). However, with existing polar‐orbiting satellites we have been largely limited to studying the multiday to interannual variability of GPP rather than its dynamic response to environmental variability across the course of a day.…”