2016
DOI: 10.1177/2325967116671300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synovial C-Shaped Tibial Footprint of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Abstract: Background:Although numerous anatomic studies about the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) structure and attachments have been performed, these studies have not reached consensus on the ACL footprint.Purpose:To investigate the existing controversy regarding the morphology of the tibial ACL insertion (footprint) and confirm histologically that the tibial ACL footprint is not completely filled with ligament tissue.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:The tibial ACL footprint was dissected from 20 diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An empty space was located posterolaterally and present in all dissections. The histological analysis of the synovial tissue located around the tibial footprint was clearly distinguishable and filled the footprint area located beside the “C‐shaped” ligament tissue [17]. These results were influenced by some bias: (1) the low sample number limits an analysis of the prevalence of anatomical variants in the morphology of the tibial footprint (2) all the specimens were male (3) the age of the knees analyzed was advanced (mean age 68.8 ± 5.4 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An empty space was located posterolaterally and present in all dissections. The histological analysis of the synovial tissue located around the tibial footprint was clearly distinguishable and filled the footprint area located beside the “C‐shaped” ligament tissue [17]. These results were influenced by some bias: (1) the low sample number limits an analysis of the prevalence of anatomical variants in the morphology of the tibial footprint (2) all the specimens were male (3) the age of the knees analyzed was advanced (mean age 68.8 ± 5.4 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%