2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1919911117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SYNPLA, a method to identify synapses displaying plasticity after learning

Abstract: Which neural circuits undergo synaptic changes when an animal learns? Although it is widely accepted that changes in synaptic strength underlie many forms of learning and memory, it remains challenging to connect changes in synaptic strength at specific neural pathways to specific behaviors and memories. Here we introduce SYNPLA (synaptic proximity ligation assay), a synapse-specific, high-throughput, and potentially brain-wide method capable of detecting circuit-specific learning-induced synaptic plasticity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To maximize the efficiency of the PLA reaction, we selected within our panel of antibodies those that would bind markers that have been described to directly interact. From our panel, Neurexin1b was the most suitable pan-synaptic marker antibody because it interacts at the molecular level with the extracellular epitopes of four postsynaptic proteins with available antibodies, namely, GluA1-4, GABA-R, Neuroligin1c, and Neuroligin2 ( Dore et al., 2020 ; Mondin et al., 2011 ; Sudhof, 2017 ; Zhang et al., 2010 ). Indeed, all four combinations yielded the characteristic punctate PLA pattern at the expected location: inhibitory synapse markers (GABA-R and Neuroligin2) preferentially located near neuronal somas, whereas excitatory PLA signals (GluA1-4 and Neuroligin1c) were found evenly distributed along the neurites ( Figure 4 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To maximize the efficiency of the PLA reaction, we selected within our panel of antibodies those that would bind markers that have been described to directly interact. From our panel, Neurexin1b was the most suitable pan-synaptic marker antibody because it interacts at the molecular level with the extracellular epitopes of four postsynaptic proteins with available antibodies, namely, GluA1-4, GABA-R, Neuroligin1c, and Neuroligin2 ( Dore et al., 2020 ; Mondin et al., 2011 ; Sudhof, 2017 ; Zhang et al., 2010 ). Indeed, all four combinations yielded the characteristic punctate PLA pattern at the expected location: inhibitory synapse markers (GABA-R and Neuroligin2) preferentially located near neuronal somas, whereas excitatory PLA signals (GluA1-4 and Neuroligin1c) were found evenly distributed along the neurites ( Figure 4 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLA had been used before to confirm synaptic interactions in the pre- or post-synaptic compartment ( Almandoz-Gil et al., 2018 ; Eagleson et al., 2013 ; Lundgren et al., 2015 ). Very recently, the utility of PLA for monitoring transsynaptic interactions was demonstrated as well ( Dore et al., 2020 ). In this work, co-cultures of neurons were used in which one population was transfected with myc-tagged Neurexin and another with hemagglutinin-tagged Neuroligin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While NMDAR antagonists certainly have revolutionized the treatment of MDD in a general population, caution should be exercised when utilizing them to treat individuals with MDD and mTORC1-related diseases, and combination therapy should be considered. Dore et al use a similar PLA assay to detect synapse changes [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%