Syntactic and Semantic Influences on the Time Course of Relative Clause Processing: The Role of Language Dominance

Abstract

We conducted a visual world eye-tracking experiment with highly proficient Spanish-English bilingual adults to investigate the effects of relative language dominance, operationalized as a continuous, multidimensional variable, on the time course of relative clause processing in the first-learned language, Spanish. We found that participants exhibited two distinct processing preferences: a semantically driven preference to assign agency to referents of lexically animate noun phrases and a syntactically driven preference to interpret relative clauses as subject-extracted. Spanish dominance was found to exert a distinct influence on each of these preferences, gradiently attenuating the semantic preference while gradiently exaggerating the syntactic preference. While these results might be attributable to particular properties of Spanish and English, they also suggest a possible generalization that greater dominance in a language increases reliance on language-specific syntactic processing strategies while correspondingly decreasing reliance on more domain-general semantic processing strategies.

Factors that moderate global similarity in initial L3 transfer

“…Taken together with the findings from Cabrelli and Pichan, existent evidence seems to point to a primary role for relative global structural similarity when Romance languages match the target L3. However, although neither categorical nor continuous dominance has predicted initial transfer for English/Spanish bilinguals, there is substantial evidence that dominance operationalized as a continuous variable can predict morphosyntactic processing (e.g., Stover et al, 2021), lexical processing (e.g., Soo & Monahan, 2022), and phonological production (e.g., Lloyd-Smith, 2021). With these findings in mind, we consider the role of degree of dominance in the current study with a larger and more varied HS sample than in Cabrelli and Pichan.…”