Syntactical Error Analysis on Report Text

Dinamika, Soraya Grabiella; Hanafiah, Ridwan

doi:10.33369/joall.v4i2.7681

Cited by 10 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…"Error considered to be evidence of learning strategies as it builds competence in the target language by regarding the rules of it" (Marina and Snuviskinie, 2005:275). The factors causing error are different grammar between L1 and L2, and lack of knowledge (Dinamika and Hanafiah, 2019). Therefore, it is obvious that learner makes errors in using target language "English" because they are still in the learning process.…”

Section: Literature Review Error Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Online Writing Exchange With Overseas Students: Efl Learners’ Errors and Perceptions

Prasetianto

Maharddhika

2020

elite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Writing skill is crucial for non-English students, like agriculture students because students are required to write an abstract of bachelor thesis in English. Nowadays, writing is not only conducted conventionally i.e. using paper and pencil, but also using the internet through online writing exchange. Several studies regarding students’ writing errors have been conducted but error analysis of agriculture students’ writing using online writing is still less researched. To fill this gap, the present study aimed to analyze the types of errors made by agriculture students during joining Online Writing Exchange with Japanese students and students’ perception of the Online Writing Exchange program. 137 students’ writings were analyzed and identified the error and counted the error. Questionnaires and interviews were used to know students’ perceptions. The results showed that there were three types of error made i.e. mechanical, grammatical, and L1-influence error. Students’ perception toward the online writing was positive although they face several difficulties. It is noteworthy that different writing media affect students’ different writing errors.

show abstract

Section: Literature Review Error Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is shown by 17 error occurrences. In line, it was noticed that subject-verb do not agree in number (Marina and Snuviškienė, 2005;Dinamika and Hanafiah, 2019). Students made a wrong agreement i.e.…”

Section: Mechanical Errormentioning

confidence: 99%

Online Writing Exchange With Overseas Students: Efl Learners’ Errors and Perceptions

Prasetianto

Maharddhika

2020

elite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…By seeing these results, it can be inferred that the negative interference of learners' L1 doesn't significantly influence the errors they make in the undergraduate thesis abstracts, moreover, it is the lack of L2 knowledge does. In line with this finding, the research conducted by Dinamika and Hanafiah (2019) find that syntactical errors made by the students of the English Department of University of Sumatera Utara also had been affected by the L2 factors. In addition, Burhanuddin (2020:30) the errors in the questionnaire instruments which are written by students of the English Department of IAIN Pekalongan were caused by the students' incomplete L2 acquirement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 57%

Grammatical Errors in Thesis Abstracts Written by the Undergraduate Students of Management Study Program

Dinamika

2021

J. appl. linguist. lit.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims at analyzing the grammatical errors in English abstracts of the undergraduate thesis. This research takes place at two private colleges in Medan city which provide the undergraduate program of management study namely Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Sukma Medan and Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Eka Prasetya. There are 20 abstracts taken as the data which are gathered from those colleges. This research engages with a qualitative descriptive approach. The data were analyzed by using the Error Analysis Method by Gass and Selinker. Based on the analysis, the categories of the grammatical errors found are the subject-verb agreement in the use of tense agreement and number agreement, and the use of the article ‘a/an/the’. The research findings show that the tense agreement error is 80, the number agreement error is 10, the omission of article a/an is 4, the omission of article ‘the’ is 153, the addition of article ‘a/an’ is 1, and the addition of article ‘the’ is 8. Hence, there are 300 grammatical errors found. Meanwhile, there are two sources of the grammatical errors; they are inter-language error and intra-language error. Yet, four factors cause grammatical error namely indeterminacy, inconsistency, simplification, and overgeneralization. Based on the findings, the researcher gives constructive pedagogical remediation which is directed to the EFL learners, English language instructor, and the syllabus developer.

show abstract

“…Getting the data from students' work, Kusumawardhani (2018) and Dinamika and Hanafiah (2019) found that morphology errors were quite dominating in students' work. Kusumawardhani (2018) found that a group of participants made derivational morphology errors in their English narrative compositions, such as in verbs, nouns, gerunds, and other forms.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kusumawardhani (2018) found that a group of participants made derivational morphology errors in their English narrative compositions, such as in verbs, nouns, gerunds, and other forms. Moreover, Dinamika and Hanafiah (2019) found that even the students of the English Literature Department make many errors in their report text writings. Besides, the research findings revealed that the most errors were in the use of the article 'a/an/the'.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Morphological Error Analysis of Students’ Written Reports on Indonesia’s 2014 Presidential Election

Dinamika

Siregar

2020

IEE Ind. J. Eng. Edu.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study, conducted at the Department of English Literature of Universitas Sumatera Utara (USU), aimed to investigate the morphological errors made by university students in their report texts on Indonesia’s Presidential Election in 2014. The objectives of this qualitative and descriptive study were to: a) find out the most predominant morphological errors made by the students; b) investigate the sources causing the errors; and c) suggest appropriate remediation for identified morphological errors. In analyzing the data, the Error Analysis theory, espoused by Gass and Selinker (2008), was applied as it provides six systematic procedures in overcoming L2 learning errors. Results of the analysis revealed that the students respectively made significant morphological errors in: a) the use of derivational morphemes with 46 errors (51%); b) the use of inflectional morphemes with 43 errors (47%); and c) the use of affixes with two errors (2%). The morphological error made by the students was caused by two primary sources, the interlanguage and intralanguage errors. To address these problematic areas, the researchers have suggested several pedagogical remediations to follow up.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesalahan morfologi yang dibuat oleh mahasiswa Departemen Sastra Inggris Universitas Sumatera Utara, dalam teks laporan yang mereka tulis tentang Pemilihan Presiden Tahun 2014. Selain itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk; a) mencari tahu jenis kesalahan morfologi apa yang paling banyak terjadi; b) mencari tahu sumber penyebab kesalahan; dan c) memberikan langkah-langkah yang sesuai untuk mengatasi kesalahan morfologi. Dalam menganalisis data, teori yang digunakan adalah Teori Analisis Kesalahan yang digubah oleh Gass & Selinker pada tahun 2008, karena teori ini memuat enam prosedur lengkap dalam menangani masalah kesalahan pembelajaran bahasa kedua. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil analisis data mengemukakan bahwa kesalahan yang paling banyak terjadi dalam penggunaan morfem derivasi dengan jumlah 46 kesalahan (51%), diikuti oleh penggunaan morfem infleksional dengan jumlah 43 kesalahan (47%), dan yang paling sedikit adalah penggunaan imbuhan dengan jumlah 2 kesalahan (2%). Ada dua penyebab terjadinya kesalahan morfologi, yaitu kesalahan intrabahasa dan kesalahan interbahasa. Selanjutnya, peneliti menyarankan sejumlah langkah remediasi pedagogik untuk mengatasi kesalahan morfologi. How to Cite: Dinamika, S. G., Siregar, E. B.A.. (2020). A Morphological Error Analysis of Students’ Written Reports on Indonesia’s 2014 Presidential Election. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 7(1), 85-94. doi:10.15408/ijee.v7i1.16978

show abstract

Syntactical Error Analysis on Report Text

Cited by 10 publications

References 3 publications

Online Writing Exchange With Overseas Students: Efl Learners’ Errors and Perceptions

Online Writing Exchange With Overseas Students: Efl Learners’ Errors and Perceptions

Grammatical Errors in Thesis Abstracts Written by the Undergraduate Students of Management Study Program

A Morphological Error Analysis of Students’ Written Reports on Indonesia’s 2014 Presidential Election

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About