2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syntax-Aware Network for Handwritten Mathematical Expression Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, we cannot find any other similar system that evaluates the entire mathematical derivation after recognition, so the direct performance comparison cannot be made. However, the ExpRate (expression recognition rates) before applying symbols replacement (depth = 0) in this study (69.18% for addition/subtraction and 64.39% for multiplication dataset) were on par with the 60-65% results in most of the recent literatures that propose mathematical expression recognition systems [27,28,29]. ExpRate after applying the symbols replacement from our system were increased to 89.31% and 87.90% for addition/subtraction and for multiplication dataset, respectively.…”
Section: Expratementioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To the best of our knowledge, we cannot find any other similar system that evaluates the entire mathematical derivation after recognition, so the direct performance comparison cannot be made. However, the ExpRate (expression recognition rates) before applying symbols replacement (depth = 0) in this study (69.18% for addition/subtraction and 64.39% for multiplication dataset) were on par with the 60-65% results in most of the recent literatures that propose mathematical expression recognition systems [27,28,29]. ExpRate after applying the symbols replacement from our system were increased to 89.31% and 87.90% for addition/subtraction and for multiplication dataset, respectively.…”
Section: Expratementioning
confidence: 52%
“…In the present, expression recognition rates (ExpRate) of encoderdecoder network are around 65% [27,28,29]. One of the limitations is the lack of large public dataset for the handwritten ME [1].…”
Section: Structure Of Cnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At each step, a parent and child node pair was generated and the relation between parent node and child node reflects the structure type. Yuan et al [39] firstly incorporate syntax information into the encoderdecoder, which achieved higer recognition accuracy while taking into account speed. Li et al [17] design a weakly-supervised counting module and jointly optimizes HMER task and symbol counting task.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in tab. 1 and 2, we compare our prosposed method with DWAP [42], DWAP-TD [46], BTTR [51], ABM [3], SAN [39] and CAN [17] on HME100K dataset. It is clear to notice that SAM-DWAP and SAM-CAN achieves the best performance.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%