2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10870-018-0730-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syntheses and Crystal Structures of Copper(II) Bis(pyrazolyl)acetic Acid Complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for metal-involving bonds, the Cu(1)−Br(2) length of the terminal bromide ion (see Table 3 ) is about 0.06 Å shorter than the Cu(1)−Br(1) distance (2.3687 (6) vs. 2.4302 (4) Å); the Cu(1)−Br(1) I bond length of the µ-bridging Br ion is instead appreciably longer at 2.7600 (5), about 0.33 Å longer than the terminal Cu−Br bond. This value is higher than the reported average for similar compounds (2.59 Å) but fits within the reported range (2.37–3.06 Å) [ 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 ]. Similar considerations can apply to the Cu−N(1) and Cu−N(3) distances: respectively, 2.017 (2) and 2.042 (3) Å (mean: 2.00, range: 1.97–2.09 Å).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As for metal-involving bonds, the Cu(1)−Br(2) length of the terminal bromide ion (see Table 3 ) is about 0.06 Å shorter than the Cu(1)−Br(1) distance (2.3687 (6) vs. 2.4302 (4) Å); the Cu(1)−Br(1) I bond length of the µ-bridging Br ion is instead appreciably longer at 2.7600 (5), about 0.33 Å longer than the terminal Cu−Br bond. This value is higher than the reported average for similar compounds (2.59 Å) but fits within the reported range (2.37–3.06 Å) [ 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 ]. Similar considerations can apply to the Cu−N(1) and Cu−N(3) distances: respectively, 2.017 (2) and 2.042 (3) Å (mean: 2.00, range: 1.97–2.09 Å).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The crystal structure investigation revealed that, in the solid state, the compound exists as a dimer of formula [Cu(L OHex )Br(μ-Br)] 2 , with the Br(1) ions binding two symmetry-related units to each other. To the best of our knowledge, this complex is one of the few mono- or di-nuclear bis-pyrazolyl acetate copper complexes [ 81 , 82 ] with uncoordinated acetate moieties, and also one of the relatively not-so-abundant copper complexes showing µ-bridging bromide ions coupled with two pentacyclic N-based ligands [ 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 ], described in the CCDC repository [ 89 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Medium broad absorptions at 1705 and 1667 cm −1 , were observed in the spectrum of compound 1 , due to the carbonylic asymmetric stretching. They were shifted with respect to the same absorption observed for the free ligand of [HC(COOH)(pz Me2 ) 2 ] (1740 cm −1 ) and were in accordance with the presence of the uncoordinated protonated carboxylic group and coordinated to the metal center carboxylate ligand, respectively [34,47,48,50,58]. A broad absorption at 1736 cm −1 was present in the spectrum of compound 2 , due to the carbonylic asymmetric stretching of the COOH groups in the same range observed for the free ligand [HC(COOH)(pz) 2 ] (1722 cm −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Among them, complexes containing bis(pyrazol-1-yl)carboxylic acids are especially of interest, due to their κ 3 - N , N , O tripodal coordination behavior, as metalloenzyme models relevant for biochemistry [28,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42] and as starting materials to yield bifunctional ligands [43,44,45,46]. In the nearly 15 years, the facially coordinating bis(pyazol-1-yl)acetate ligands, typically substituted at the 3,5-positions of the pyrazolyl rings, have been used to synthesize several structurally characterized copper(II) complexes [34,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. Many of these coordination compounds were studied for their unique structural, electrochemical, and catalytic properties; however, to our knowledge, biological studies on the anticancer properties of bis(pyrazolyl)acetate copper(II) complexes are unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%