2002
DOI: 10.1002/1521-3749(200211)628:11<2489::aid-zaac2489>3.0.co;2-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syntheses and Crystal Structures of a New Niobium Polysulfide K6Nb4S22 and two New Dimorphic Tantalum Polysulfides K6Ta4S22

Abstract: The new compounds K 6 Nb 4 S 22 and K 6 Ta 4 S 22 (I) have been synthesised by the reaction of NbS 2 or Ta metal in a K 2 S 3 flux. Using TaS 2 as educt a second modification of K 6 Ta 4 S 22 (II) is obtained. K 6 Nb 4 S 22 and K 6 Ta 4 S 22 (form I) crystallise in the monoclinic space group C2/c with a ϭ 35.634 (2) Å , b ϭ 7.8448 (4) Å , c ϭ 12.1505 (5) Å , β ϭ 100.853 (5)°, V ϭ 3335.8 (3) Å 3 , and Z ϭ 4 for K 6 Nb 4 S 22 and a ϭ 35.563 (7) Å , b ϭ 7.836 (2) Å , c ϭ 12.139 (2) Å , β ϭ 100.56 (3)°, V ϭ 3325.5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ta-S distances range from 2.463(1) to 2.639(1) Å with an average /Ta-SS of 2.527(1) Å for Ta(1) and from 2.455(1) to 2.654(1) Å (average /Ta-SS: 2.526(1) Å ) for Ta(2) ( Table 3). These distances are in good agreement with the values reported for other potassium tantalum sulfides [13,14,16] and the sum of ionic radii of Ta and S as well [27].…”
Section: Crystal Structuresupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Ta-S distances range from 2.463(1) to 2.639(1) Å with an average /Ta-SS of 2.527(1) Å for Ta(1) and from 2.455(1) to 2.654(1) Å (average /Ta-SS: 2.526(1) Å ) for Ta(2) ( Table 3). These distances are in good agreement with the values reported for other potassium tantalum sulfides [13,14,16] and the sum of ionic radii of Ta and S as well [27].…”
Section: Crystal Structuresupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Depending on the reaction conditions and size of the cations, structures with discrete molecular anions [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] or chains [21][22][23][24] are formed. In the case of tantalum, examples include discrete tetrahedral TaQ 4 units like in A 3 TaQ 4 (A ¼ K, Rb, Cs, Q ¼ S, Se) [6][7][8], Ta 2 S 11 groups like in A 4 Ta 2 S 11 (A ¼ K, Rb, Cs) [13][14][15], complex Ta 4 S 22 units like in A 6 Ta 4 S 22 (A ¼ K, Rb, Cs) [16,18,19], and Ta 4 S 25 like in Rb 6 Ta 4 S 25 units [20]. The Ta 2 S 11 unit is composed of two face sharing TaS 7 pentagonal bipyramids and is a building block which may be interconnected through S 2 2À and S 5 2À polyanions yielding the Ta 4 S 22 and Ta 4 S 25 unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nb-Nb distance amounts to 3.574 (2) Å which is too long for any metal-to-metal interaction [radius: 0.69 Å for Nb 5+ (CN7)] (Shannon, 1976). All values agree well with those reported for Rb 6 Ta 4 S 25 (Stoll et al, 2000) and A 6 Nb 4 S 22 (A = K, Rb, Cs; Bensch & Dürichen, 1996b;Stoll et al, 2002). The three crystallographically independent rubidium cations are in an irregular sulfur environment.…”
Section: S1 Commentsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The flux can be nonreactive or reactive; in the latter case the flux itself becomes incorporated into the product (7,8). This wellestablished approach has demonstrated the prolific discovery of novel inorganic materials grown out of low-melting fluxes, from oxides and other chalcogenides (9)(10)(11)(12), to pnictides (13,14), to intermetallics (15), many of which cannot be attained by direct combinations of the elements. Despite the variety of metastable phases formed in these reactions, the classical approach is to predetermine a given set of reaction conditions (e.g., time, temperature, and heating and cooling rates) and wait for completion to isolate and identify the formed compounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%