2016
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.201600196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syntheses and Structures of Zinc Bis(phosphinimino)methanide Complexes

Abstract: Reactions of bis(

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both exhibit C 3 symmetry in solution as indicated by splitting of the diastereotopic Ar–C H 2 –Ar and Ar–C H 2 –CH 3 resonances. Their 31 P NMR resonances (at 102.1 and 96.0 ppm for 4 and 5 , respectively) are shifted downfield from that of the free ligand 3 (−0.4 ppm), reflecting both the expected downfield shift upon binding a Lewis acidic metal center 32,33 and the population of paramagnetic excited states as is commonly observed in [Fe 4 S 4 ] 2+ clusters; 23,3438 their room-temperature solution magnetic moments (μ eff = 2.7 and 2.8 μ B , respectively) are consistent with this interpretation and typical of [Fe 4 S 4 ] 2+ clusters. 35,3941 The 1 H NMR signals corresponding to the −C H 3 and −C H 2 – protons of the ethyl ligand in 5 are observed at −4.6 and 70.0 ppm, respectively, which also indicates the population of paramagnetic excited states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Both exhibit C 3 symmetry in solution as indicated by splitting of the diastereotopic Ar–C H 2 –Ar and Ar–C H 2 –CH 3 resonances. Their 31 P NMR resonances (at 102.1 and 96.0 ppm for 4 and 5 , respectively) are shifted downfield from that of the free ligand 3 (−0.4 ppm), reflecting both the expected downfield shift upon binding a Lewis acidic metal center 32,33 and the population of paramagnetic excited states as is commonly observed in [Fe 4 S 4 ] 2+ clusters; 23,3438 their room-temperature solution magnetic moments (μ eff = 2.7 and 2.8 μ B , respectively) are consistent with this interpretation and typical of [Fe 4 S 4 ] 2+ clusters. 35,3941 The 1 H NMR signals corresponding to the −C H 3 and −C H 2 – protons of the ethyl ligand in 5 are observed at −4.6 and 70.0 ppm, respectively, which also indicates the population of paramagnetic excited states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The new zinc complexes [{CH­(Ph 2 PNR) 2 }­ZnMe] (R = Dipp ( 80 ), Ph ( 81 )), [{CH­(Ph 2 PNR) 2 }­ZnEt] (R = SiMe 3 ( 82 ), Dipp ( 83 ), Ph ( 84 )), and [{CH­(Ph 2 PNSiMe 3 ) 2 }­ZnPh] ( 85 ) were prepared through the reaction of a neutral ligand ( 1TMS , 1Dipp , or 1Ph ) with either 1 or 2 equiv of ZnR 2 (R = Me, Et, Ph) (Scheme ). , In both cases, the ligand underwent monodeprotonation only, resulting in the formation of a monoanionic ligand. The structures of the complexes 80 – 85 were very similar to each other and monomeric like 75 – 78 and consisted of a six-membered metallacyclic structure in which the ligand acted as a bidentate chelate and the zinc centers adopted distorted trigonal-planar geometry.…”
Section: D-block Metal Complexesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The single deprotonation of the BIPM-H 2 ligand by ZnMe 2 to yield Zn­(BIPM-H)­Me complexes proceeds smoothly already at room temperature . In contrast, the synthesis of Zn carbene complexes of the type ZnCR 2 with doubly deprotonated BIPM ligands is not straightforward.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 31 P NMR spectrum only shows one singlet signal at 29.83 ppm, indicating chemical equivalence of the phosphorus atoms at the measuring temperature. Although numerous heteroleptic Zn­(BIPM-H)­R or Zn­(BIPM-H)­X (X = halide) have been reported, complex ( 5 -H) 2 Zn is the first homoleptic complex of the type Zn­(BIPM-H) 2 . Its 13 C and 31 P chemical shift as well as 1 J C–P coupling constant in the CP 2 unit are comparable to those in heteroleptic complexes …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation