“…They have also demonstrated higher radical scavenging efficiency than the corresponding S and Se compounds. 41,42 Organotellurium compounds have been much less explored in biology unlike the compounds of its lower congeners (S and Se), even though tellurium exhibit various similar properties of sulfur and selenium [43][44][45][46] which may be due to the fact that tellurium was considered non-essential biological trace element, commercial non-availability of a wide variety of organotellurium compounds as starting materials and some misconception that they are air sensitive, foul smelling and even toxic. A few reasons among enhanced interest currently in the biological chemistry of organotellurium compounds are the availability of modern analytical techniques ( 125 Te Fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance, FT-NMR; atomic absorption spectroscopy, AAS; and inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry, ICP-AES) to study and understand the solution behavior of Te containing systems, such an option does not exist for sulfur compounds, the secondary interactions (Te … X where X = O, Cl, Br, I or M) arises from the hypervalent nature of Te, thus increases the stability of organotellurium compounds and higher redox activity of the tellurium.…”