2001
DOI: 10.1021/bk-2001-0796.ch008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Biological Activity of Epothilones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19]). Important contributions to the understanding of the epothilone SAR have also come from the research groups at Novartis (Altmann and coworkers, now at the ETH in Zürich) [67,103] and Schering [104] as well as the collaborative efforts between Hçfle and co-workers at the GBF (for example, see refs. [105,106]) and the group at BMS (for example, see ref.…”
Section: Epothilone Analoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[19]). Important contributions to the understanding of the epothilone SAR have also come from the research groups at Novartis (Altmann and coworkers, now at the ETH in Zürich) [67,103] and Schering [104] as well as the collaborative efforts between Hçfle and co-workers at the GBF (for example, see refs. [105,106]) and the group at BMS (for example, see ref.…”
Section: Epothilone Analoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[109,129] Likewise, modifications designed to stabilize the purported bioactive conformation in this region, based on pharmacophore modeling, only led to inactive analogues. [67,104,130] More recently, however, a number of new epothilone analogues with modifications in the C9-C11 region have been described that are characterized by potent antiproliferative activity in vitro, some of which also show an improved in vivo pharmacological profile over Epo B and Epo D. These analogues are characterized by the presence of trans double bonds either between C10 and C11 or between C9 and C10. They have been obtained through both isolation from bacterial fermentation broths [10][11][12] and total chemical synthesis (spearheaded by the Danishefsky group).…”
Section: C9-c11 Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total synthesis of EpoA to EpoD was accomplished in various laboratories including ours (5,7,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). To get more insight into the differential effects of epoxide-and olefin-bearing epothilone analogs, we have synthesized the natural compounds EpoB͞ EpoD and the new compounds 6-propyl-EpoB (pEB) and 6-propyl-EpoD (pED) and characterized their effects on tumor cell growth inhibition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the obvious modifications suggested by this model is the incorporation of variably positioned meta-substituted phenyl rings in the C(9)ÀC(12) segment of epothilones, which should lead to a stabilization of the bioactive conformation. Thus, compounds such as 8 or 9 arose as attractive target structures for our analog program, and the similarity between the preferred conformation of Epo B and those of compounds 8/9 is illustrated in the Figure. Analog 9 has been independently identified by the Schering AG group as an interesting compound to investigate, and its synthesis and biological assessment have recently been published [29]. Surprisingly, this analog was found to exhibit −reduced× biological activity [29] (more specific data are not available in [29]; cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, compounds such as 8 or 9 arose as attractive target structures for our analog program, and the similarity between the preferred conformation of Epo B and those of compounds 8/9 is illustrated in the Figure. Analog 9 has been independently identified by the Schering AG group as an interesting compound to investigate, and its synthesis and biological assessment have recently been published [29]. Surprisingly, this analog was found to exhibit −reduced× biological activity [29] (more specific data are not available in [29]; cf. also [30]), indicating that either the above conformational premises may be incorrect or, alternatively, that the incorporation of the bulky m-phenylene moiety is incompatible with the topology of the tubulin binding site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%