We studied the biochemical properties of a genetically engineered neurokinin-1 receptor (NK 1 R) in which two residues lying on the extracellular edge of the fourth transmembrane domain were replaced by equivalently located elements of the neurokinin-2 receptor (G166C, Y167F NK 1 R mutant). The mutation produced two effects. The first is enhancement of the apparent binding affinity for heterologous tachykinins (substance K and neurokinin B) and for N-or C-terminal modified analogues of substance P, but not for substance P itself, its full-length analogues, and several peptide and nonpeptide antagonists. Only two antagonists, as exceptions, were found to exhibit a diminished affinity for the mutant receptor. The second effect is a shift in NK 1 R preference for distinct G protein-mediated signaling pathways. NK 1 R-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis was enhanced both in transiently and permanently transfected cells, while stimulation of cAMP accumulation did not change in transient expression experiments and was reduced in permanently expressing cells.The effect of the mutation on ligand affinity was not related to any obvious structural commonality, nor to the selectivity for different neurokinin receptors or the agonistic/antagonistic nature of the ligand. However, all ligands responding to the mutation appear to share the ability to induce phosphoinositide signaling more efficiently than cAMP responses when binding to NK 1 R. We suggest that the mutation shifts the internal equilibria of different functional forms of NK 1 R. A theoretical analysis according to a multistate allosteric model suggests that the link between binding and biological changes can result from altered stability constants of substates in the conformational space of the receptor.Tachykinins, as several other families of neuropeptides, display a bipartite distribution of topochemical information on their sequence. The C-terminal half of the molecule is a consensus motif tightly conserved among all known hormones from mammalian and nonmammalian species (1, 2) and, conceivably, constitutes a default conditional element to establish binding affinity for any kind of tachykinin receptor subtype (3,4). The N-terminal part is instead variable even among the three mammalian tachykinin types, and it is believed to contribute interactions establishing selectivity for specific receptor subtypes (3, 4). The interesting question is whether a similar partition in the molecule of the receptor corresponds to such a sharp division between variant and invariant elements in the molecule of the peptide and, if so, to what relative extent do selective and nonselective interactions contribute to the final binding affinity of each peptide hormone and receptor system.We focused on two amino acids marking the junction between the fourth putative transmembrane domain (TMD) 1 and the second extracellular loop of tachykinin receptors. Replacement of these two residues in the substance P receptor (neurokinin-1 receptor (NK 1 R)) with those located at equivalent pos...