The iminophenol 3,5‐tBu2‐2‐(OH)C6H2CH=NR and theaminophenol 3,5‐tBu2‐2‐(OH)C6H2CH2‐NHR (R = tBu, 2,6‐Me2C6H3, C6F5) were prepared in good yields by the appropriate synthetic methods. Reactions of these compounds with AlH3·NEtMe2 in toluene gave the mononuclear [AlH{3,5‐tBu2‐2‐(O)C6H2CH2‐NR}·NEtMe2] [R = 2,6‐Me2C6H3 (3), C6F5 (4)] or dinuclear [AlH{μ‐3,5‐tBu2‐2‐(O)C6H2CH2‐NtBu}]2 (5) phenoxido–amido aluminium derivatives. All synthesized complexes were characterized by NMR spectroscopic and analytical methods. The X‐ray structure of 5 shows a dinuclear molecule in which the aluminium centres are unusually linked by μ2‐N(amido) atoms to form a central planar Al2N2 ring in a clearly preferential disposition over the more common Al2O2 ring. The experimental work has been assisted by the B3LYP functional and the 6‐31G* basis sets as implemented in Gaussian 03 calculations to determine the role played by the nitrogen substituent group in the structural disposition adopted by the prepared (monohydrido)aluminium compounds, in order to evaluate the factors affecting the coordination modes of the phenoxido–amido ligand on aluminium.