2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra06512g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and characterization of a CuS–WO3 composite photocatalyst for enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity

Abstract: WO3 nanorods and flower-like CuS were synthesized by hydrothermal process. The visible light driven CuS-WO3 photocatalyst was prepared by adding different weight ratios (10-40%) of CuS on WO3 by wet impregnation method. The synthesized photocatalysts were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX) and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that cathodic corrosion could also be used to incorporate dopants for increasing the visible light response of the resulting nanoparticles. Certain dopants have already been shown in the literature to red shift the band edge of WO 3 , [36][37][38] and could bolster the visible activity of H 2 WO 4 particles.…”
Section: Electrochemical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesize that cathodic corrosion could also be used to incorporate dopants for increasing the visible light response of the resulting nanoparticles. Certain dopants have already been shown in the literature to red shift the band edge of WO 3 , [36][37][38] and could bolster the visible activity of H 2 WO 4 particles.…”
Section: Electrochemical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.5 eV), Eg is the calculated band gap from the DRS and ECB is the conduction band edge. The electronegativity value of CdS and WO 3 were 5.18 and 6.59, respectively ,. The VB and CB potentials of CdS were 1.57 and –0.21 eV, respectively, while CB and VB potentials for WO 3 were 3.32 and 0.86 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The electronegativity value of CdS and WO 3 were 5.18 and 6.59, respectively. [27,56] The VB and CB potentials of CdS were 1.57 and -0.21 eV, respectively, while CB and VB potentials for WO 3 were 3.32 and 0.86 eV, respectively. Finally, a schematic illustration of the charge carrier migration and separation in the CdS-WO 3 nanocomposite was proposed ( Figure 15).…”
Section: Photocatalytic Degradation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Between the two, sulfur‐rich CuS (also known as covellite mineral) has become an important p‐type semiconductor material due to its narrow bandgap (∼2.2 eV) and potential application value as a co‐catalyst. In addition, CuS is a well‐known candidate material for visible‐light photocatalysis since it owns an additional absorption band in the near‐infrared region (NIR), which allows it to exhibit low reflectance in the visible range and a rather high reflectance in the NIR . However, the improvement and development of this semiconductor material towards practical application is limited due to the fast recombination of the photogenerated electron‐hole pairs of CuS.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Metal Sulfidesmentioning
confidence: 99%