2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and characterization of Au supported on carbonaceous material-based catalysts for the selective oxidation of glycerol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have found that larger metal particles are more selective in glycerol liquid phase oxidation. However, Gil et al [22] reported for gold-sol supported catalyst that both conversion and selectivity increased with decreasing gold particle sizes, what is in good agreement in our experimental results. ) determined after 0.5 h of reaction, c -reaction time to achieve 50 % glycerol conversion, d -conversion of glycerol after 3 h of reaction, e -selectivity to glyceric acid (GLYA), tartronic acid (TARA), glycolic acid (GLYCA), formic acid (FORMA) and oxalic acid (OXA), respectively at 50 % of glycerol conversion, f -yield of Σ(glyceric acid and tartronic acid) after 3 h of reaction.…”
Section: Catalytic Performancesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several authors have found that larger metal particles are more selective in glycerol liquid phase oxidation. However, Gil et al [22] reported for gold-sol supported catalyst that both conversion and selectivity increased with decreasing gold particle sizes, what is in good agreement in our experimental results. ) determined after 0.5 h of reaction, c -reaction time to achieve 50 % glycerol conversion, d -conversion of glycerol after 3 h of reaction, e -selectivity to glyceric acid (GLYA), tartronic acid (TARA), glycolic acid (GLYCA), formic acid (FORMA) and oxalic acid (OXA), respectively at 50 % of glycerol conversion, f -yield of Σ(glyceric acid and tartronic acid) after 3 h of reaction.…”
Section: Catalytic Performancesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The metals used in these studies included Pd, Pt, Au, Pt-Bi, Au-Pd, Au-Pt supported usually on carbonaceous materials (active carbon, charcoal, graphite, carbon nanotubes) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] [24][25][26][27], MgAl 2 O 4 -spinels [28] or hydrotalcite [29] have also been employed. A second metal or promoter is added sometimes in order to improve the activity and/or selectivity, to inhibit the over-oxidation or to prevent the deactivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TPR profiles revealed that the interaction between the metal phase and the support varied depending on the metal particle size. Thus, stronger interactions were obtained for those catalysts having smaller Cu particles since T max decreased with the Cu particle size (Table 1) [20,23,24]. Thus, the reducibility of the catalysts followed the sequence: 50% Cu-AC > 20% Cu-AC > 10% Cu-AC.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Cu Powder Catalysts And The Cu Electmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The study determined supports with few structural defects such as graphite and ribbon carbon nanofibers stabilize Au significantly better than fishbone and platelet nanofibers that offer a prismatic surface to the nanoparticles (i.e. edges) [157,158]. Catalysts with graphitic supports were more selective towards glyceric acid and gave higher turnover frequencies.…”
Section: Selective Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 98%