2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and characterization of chitosan nanoparticles and their effect on Fusarium head blight and oxidative activity in wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
6
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, compounds 1 d and 1 f do not impair the morphology of F. keratoplasticum since no evident cellular damage or morphological modifications of tubular structures was noted when compared to the control. Same morphological damage in fungi cells was recently observed in related studies using SEM, after treating the strains with a variety of organic compounds or nanoparticles …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…On the other hand, compounds 1 d and 1 f do not impair the morphology of F. keratoplasticum since no evident cellular damage or morphological modifications of tubular structures was noted when compared to the control. Same morphological damage in fungi cells was recently observed in related studies using SEM, after treating the strains with a variety of organic compounds or nanoparticles …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It has been predicted that chitosan (CS) and chitosan nanoparticles (CS/NPs) could be used as antimicrobial agents against F. graminearum and as a substitute for synthetic fungicides owing to their antimicrobial activity, biocompatibility and lower harmfulness toward mammalian cells (Kheiri et al ., ).…”
Section: Biological Control Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Their inhibitory effect on C. gloeosporioides follows the trend: chitosan nanoparticles-methanol nanche extract (79.6%) > CSNps (57.0%) > BCS (9.4%). In another work, Kheiri et al employed three different molecular weights (MW) of chitosan (i.e., low MW of 161 kDa, medium MW of 300 kDa, and high MW of 810 kDa) for the formation of nanoparticulate systems [45]. The resulting nanoparticles exhibit lower zeta potential and a bigger average size with the increase of the molecular weight and thus, subsequently, resulted in lower antifungal activity on Fusarium graminearum (in vitro).…”
Section: Biocides Against Plant Pathogens and Pestsmentioning
confidence: 99%