2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2013.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and characterization of magnetic dichromate hybrid nanomaterials with triphenylphosphine surface modified iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4@SiO2@PPh3@Cr2O72−)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process for the preparation of ImmPd(0)‐MNPs catalyst is schematically described in Scheme . Briefly, CS‐methionine was first attached to chitosan by the reaction between methyl methioninate and chitosan in DMF and then was treated with Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles prepared by mixing of FeCl 3 .6H 2 O and FeSO 4 according to the reported procedure . Finally, immobilization of Pd(0) on the surface of magnetic support results in acting as a robust anchor and avoiding Pd leaching.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process for the preparation of ImmPd(0)‐MNPs catalyst is schematically described in Scheme . Briefly, CS‐methionine was first attached to chitosan by the reaction between methyl methioninate and chitosan in DMF and then was treated with Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles prepared by mixing of FeCl 3 .6H 2 O and FeSO 4 according to the reported procedure . Finally, immobilization of Pd(0) on the surface of magnetic support results in acting as a robust anchor and avoiding Pd leaching.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, CS–methionine was prepared by the reaction between methyl methioninate and chitosan in dimethylformamide (DMF). In the second step, CS–methionine was treated with Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles prepared by mixing of FeCl 3 ⋅6H 2 O and FeSO 4 according to a reported procedure, to obtain Fe 3 O 4 –CS–methionine as a magnetic substrate. Finally, palladium acetate was grafted into this magnetic support in ethanol to afford ImmPd(0)‐MNPs as the final catalyst.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles were prepared without using any plugging agent or surfactant via conventional co‐precipitation of iron(II) sulfate and iron(III) chloride according to a reported procedure . After sonication, Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles (2.1 g) were treated with CS–methionine (0.7 g) in 2 wt% acetic acid solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conquer these difficulties, nowadays, magnetic nanoparticles have been used as a catalyst support, which include the advantage of very high surface area and easy recovery and recycling of catalyst. In this way, magnetic separation offers a convenient and efficient method for the recovery of the nanomagnetic catalyst from C–C cross‐coupling reaction systems …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this way, magnetic separation offers a convenient and efficient method for the recovery of the nanomagnetic catalyst from C-C cross-coupling reaction systems. [37] Extensive literature survey reveals that no reports are available on the synthesis and characterization of 1,3,4trisubstituted 1,2,3-triazol-5-ylidene metal complexes on the surface of magnetic nanoparticles with high catalytic activity in Suzuki-Miyaura and Mizoroki-Heck crosscoupling reactions. Thus in continuation of our investigations on magnetically recyclable nanomagnetic catalysts in various organic transformations, we report here a new magnetic nanoparticle supported 1,3,4-trisubstituted 1,2,3-triazol-5-ylidene-palladium (II) nanomagnetic catalyst whose ligand system is based on mesoionic carbenes which is entirely different from NHCs and Schiff-base ligand system which were reported in our earlier work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%