2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and characterization of new ultrafiltration ceramic membranes for water treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although polymer membranes have commonly been used in industry, they suffer from some disadvantages including low thermal resistance and mechanical strength. In contrast, the ceramic membranes have superlative chemical, physical, and biological stability at high pressures and temperatures, and also they are resistant to UV irradiations [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although polymer membranes have commonly been used in industry, they suffer from some disadvantages including low thermal resistance and mechanical strength. In contrast, the ceramic membranes have superlative chemical, physical, and biological stability at high pressures and temperatures, and also they are resistant to UV irradiations [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two ultrafiltration membranes synthesized using local barbotine, kaolin, zirconia, and alkoxide show good dye and salt rejections. [ 41 ] Due to the strong electrostatic repulsions between the dyes and the membranes, this compound has a significant hydraulic permeability and removal rate; however, over time, it reduces the membranes’ pores size.…”
Section: Nature‐inspired‐based Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dye rejection of three concentrations (10 −5 , 10 −4 , 10 −3 M) of crystal violet (MW= 407,99 g/mol, λmax = 590 g/mol), malachite green (MW= 927,02 g/mol, λmax = 616 nm), supranol yellow (MW= 452 g/mol, λmax = 402 nm), and orange II (MW = 350 g/mol, λmax = 484 nm) solutions was filtered tangentially for two hours at a TMP of 3.5 bar was determined according to (Chougui et al, 2019):…”
Section: Ultrafiltration Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%