“…230 The mononuclear nature of fac-RuCl 2 (ttp), as opposed to the triply chloro-bridged bimetallic structure of [(etp)Ru-(µ-Cl) 3 Ru(etp)]Cl, was attributed to purely steric reasons, as the Ru(ttp) unit occupies a larger volume than Ru(etp). 230 Similar five-coordinate mononuclear complexes of formula RuCl 2 (P 3 ) were obtained from 8 with chiral bis(ferrocenyl)-triphosphine ligands such as (S)-(R)-Pigiphos (bis{(S)-1-(R)-2-(diphenylphosphino)ferrocenyl]ethyl}cyclohexylphosphine, Chart 18), 234 with the chiral ligand (R)-Ph 2 PCH 2 CH-(PPh 2 )CH 2 CH 2 PPh 2 (etp*), 235 with PhP(CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 P-(C 6 H 11 ) 2 ) 2 (Cyttp), 236 and with the tridentate phosphinite ligand MeC(CH 2 OPPh 2 ) 3 (triphox, Chart 18); 212 interestingly, this latter complex showed a triply chloro-bridged dimeric structure in the solid state, while in chloroform solution a significant part of the complex existed as the monomeric form.…”