2002
DOI: 10.1002/1521-3757(20020802)114:15<2966::aid-ange2966>3.0.co;2-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Characterization of the Neutral“Digallene” Ar′GaGaAr′ and Its Reduction to Na2Ar′GaGaAr′ (Ar′=2,6-Dipp2C6H3, Dipp=2,6-iPr2C6H3)

Abstract: Eine Ga‐Ga‐Bindungsordnung wesentlich kleiner als 1 in dem „Digallen“ Ar′GaGaAr′ (Ar′=2,6‐Dipp2C6H3, Dipp=2,6‐iPr2C6H3; siehe Struktur) – darauf lassen Struktur und Verhalten in Lösung schließen.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) The treatment of tetrahalogenosubhalides of the type X 2 (L)E-E(L)X 2 still containing an E-E single bond with aryl or silyl alkali metal compounds in molar ratios of 1:1 or 1:2 gave organosubhalides in moderate to sufficient yields (Kehrwald et al 2001;Klemp et al 2000b;Linti and Köstler 1996;Cowley et al 1996); (2) The reduction of a silylgallium(III) chloride [silyl=Si(CMe 3 ) 3 ] with alkali metals yielded a disilyldigallium(II) subhalide as an intermediate on the way to the formation of a tetrahedral Ga 4 cluster (Wiberg et al 2002); (3) Disproportionation in the course of the reaction of GaBr or "GaI" (see above) with aryl or silyl alkali metal derivatives gave the corresponding subhalides which, however, in many cases were isolated in low yields only in the presence of several other products, such as clusters of higher nuclearity (Kehrwald et al 2001;Hardman et al 2002Hardman et al , 2003; (4) The dilithium salt of diisopropyl aminoborole was used for the reduction of an organoindium(III) dichloride (Lomelí et al 1998). The structures of these subhalides may be described as three different types, which in part were also observed for the compounds derived from the clusters.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) The treatment of tetrahalogenosubhalides of the type X 2 (L)E-E(L)X 2 still containing an E-E single bond with aryl or silyl alkali metal compounds in molar ratios of 1:1 or 1:2 gave organosubhalides in moderate to sufficient yields (Kehrwald et al 2001;Klemp et al 2000b;Linti and Köstler 1996;Cowley et al 1996); (2) The reduction of a silylgallium(III) chloride [silyl=Si(CMe 3 ) 3 ] with alkali metals yielded a disilyldigallium(II) subhalide as an intermediate on the way to the formation of a tetrahedral Ga 4 cluster (Wiberg et al 2002); (3) Disproportionation in the course of the reaction of GaBr or "GaI" (see above) with aryl or silyl alkali metal derivatives gave the corresponding subhalides which, however, in many cases were isolated in low yields only in the presence of several other products, such as clusters of higher nuclearity (Kehrwald et al 2001;Hardman et al 2002Hardman et al , 2003; (4) The dilithium salt of diisopropyl aminoborole was used for the reduction of an organoindium(III) dichloride (Lomelí et al 1998). The structures of these subhalides may be described as three different types, which in part were also observed for the compounds derived from the clusters.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolation of low‐valent gallium(I) carbene analogue from the reaction of ‘‘GaI’’with lithiated β ‐diketimine by Power and co‐workers, encouraged us to perform the reaction of 1 with ‘‘GaI’’ to generate N,O ‐coordinated low‐valent Ga(I) complex. As shown in Scheme , to our surprise, the reaction led to the isolation of a stable heteroleptic digallane(II) complex [OCMeCHCMeN‐(Dipp)] 2 Ga 2 I 2 , 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ga−Ga bond distance of 2.4002(4) Å is significantly shorter as compared to reported digallane complexes. For example, as shown in Figure , ArGa(I)‐Ga(I)Ar ( I ) (2.492(2) Å) (Ar=2,6‐Dipp 2 C 6 H 3 ), [(Me 3 Si) 2 C(Ph)C(Me 3 Si)N] 2 Ga 2 Cl 2 ( II ) (2.445(9) Å), [(L Et ) • −ClGa‐GaCl(L Et ) • −] ( III ) (2.444(1) Å) (L=[(2, 6‐ i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 )NC(Me)] 2 ) and [(ArN(X)C(Ar)N) 2 Ga 2 I] 2 ( IV ) (2.430(1) Å when X=Me; 2.4304(10) Å when X=H). In an attempt to generate low‐valent Ga(I), [OCMeCHCMeN(Dipp)]Ga(I), compound 4 was treated with potassium that led to decomposition of the starting material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently it was even possible to stabilize derivatives of the parent compound HGaGaH, which features a much weaker metal–metal bond 11. Again, the parent compound HGaGaH was first generated and characterized in matrix isolation experiments 12.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%