2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11173-005-0176-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of (18-Crown-6)(nitrato)(triphenylphosphine oxide)potassium

Abstract: A new complex (18-crown-6)(nitrato)(triphenylphosphine oxide)potassium ( I ) is synthesized, and its crystal structure is studied by X-ray diffraction analysis (space group R 3 m , a = 14.336 Å , c = 13.776 Å , Z = 3). The structure is solved by the direct method and refined by the full-matrix least-squares method in the anisotropic approximation to R = 0.034 for 1122 independent reflections (CAD4 automated diffractometer, λ Mo K α radiation). Structure I contains a complex host-guest molecule [K ( NO 3 )(18 -… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These molecules bind K + ions in a cage of oxygen atoms ∼2.8 Å in diameter, but can deform to bind to the smaller Na + ion with its optimal 2.4-Å diameter ( Fig. 4 ) ( Kilbourn et al, 1967 ; Dobler and Phizackerley, 1974 ; Neupertlaves and Dobler, 1975 ; Kauffmann et al, 1976 ; Steinrauf et al, 1982 ; Izatt et al, 1985 ; Cram and Ho, 1986 ; Chekhlov, 2005a , c ). Because many molecules change their shape depending on the bound ligand, it’s difficult to predict which ion would be optimally bound to a particular ion-binding site without knowing the equilibrium preference in advance.…”
Section: Role For a Queue Of Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These molecules bind K + ions in a cage of oxygen atoms ∼2.8 Å in diameter, but can deform to bind to the smaller Na + ion with its optimal 2.4-Å diameter ( Fig. 4 ) ( Kilbourn et al, 1967 ; Dobler and Phizackerley, 1974 ; Neupertlaves and Dobler, 1975 ; Kauffmann et al, 1976 ; Steinrauf et al, 1982 ; Izatt et al, 1985 ; Cram and Ho, 1986 ; Chekhlov, 2005a , c ). Because many molecules change their shape depending on the bound ligand, it’s difficult to predict which ion would be optimally bound to a particular ion-binding site without knowing the equilibrium preference in advance.…”
Section: Role For a Queue Of Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%