1984
DOI: 10.1021/om00079a020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and crystallographic characterization of a dinuclear 1,2-hydrazido(2-) complex of tungsten(VI), [W(.eta.5-C5Me4(CMe3))(CCMe3)I]2(.mu.-N2H2).CH2Cl2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar W(VI)-alkylidynes featuring WuC t Bu groups, all exhibit a nearly linear ∠WuC-C angle, ranging between 170-175°. [1][2][3]8,30,32,[38][39][40] The closest evidence for a high valent W-alkylidyne that shows significant deviation in its ∠WuC-C angle is the complex CpWuCAd(CH 2 t Bu) 2 reported by Schrock; 41 this complex, bearing an adamantyl unit on the WuC α features an acute ∠WuC-C angle of 166.2 (6)°. The complexes TpWuC t Bu(NHPh) 2 (Boncella et al; ∠WuC-C angle = 166.5(4)°) 42 and Tp*WuCPh(Br) 2 (McCleverty et al; ∠WuC-C angle = 168.0(8)°) 43 also exhibit ∠WuC-C angles that deviate significantly from linearity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Similar W(VI)-alkylidynes featuring WuC t Bu groups, all exhibit a nearly linear ∠WuC-C angle, ranging between 170-175°. [1][2][3]8,30,32,[38][39][40] The closest evidence for a high valent W-alkylidyne that shows significant deviation in its ∠WuC-C angle is the complex CpWuCAd(CH 2 t Bu) 2 reported by Schrock; 41 this complex, bearing an adamantyl unit on the WuC α features an acute ∠WuC-C angle of 166.2 (6)°. The complexes TpWuC t Bu(NHPh) 2 (Boncella et al; ∠WuC-C angle = 166.5(4)°) 42 and Tp*WuCPh(Br) 2 (McCleverty et al; ∠WuC-C angle = 168.0(8)°) 43 also exhibit ∠WuC-C angles that deviate significantly from linearity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The stability of a metallacyclobutadiene relative to the alkylidyne precursor is dependent on a combination of steric and electronic contributors. [33][34][35] Schrock and co-workers first demonstrated that poorly basic ancillary ligands stabilize metallacyclobutadienes. [33][34][35] Some relevant examples are the tungstenacyclobutadiene W(κ 2 -C 3 R 3 )(OR) 3 with weakly basic alkoxides -OC(CF 3 ) 2 CH 3 , 35 -OCH(CF 3 ) 2 , 35 and -OC 6 H 3 ( i Pr) 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter complex is unique in that combined structural, spectroscopic, and DFT calculations suggest that the bridging ‘diazene’ is best formulated as N 2 H 2 2- . While this level of diazene activation has been observed in complexes of highly reducing early transition metals [9] it is not well established for the later transition metals, including iron. [7, 10] One-electron reduction of the [Fe 2 (μ-N 2 H 2 )] 2+ complex furnishes the EPR-active mixed-valent [Fe 2 (μ-N 2 H 2 )] 1+ complex, whose electronic structure characterization by combined EPR/ENDOR spectroscopy is described.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] For example, 3 J (H,H) = 28.0 Hz for [(CO) 5 Cr] 2 ( trans -μ-N 2 H 2 ), [13] which has an N-N bond distance of 1.25 Å, [14] while 3 J (H,H) = 9.4 Hz for [(η 5 -C 5 Me 4 H) 2 ZrI] 2 ( trans -μ-N 2 H 2 ), which has an N-N bond distance of 1.414(3) Å. [9b] Hence, the observed 3 J (H,H) coupling in 3 is most consistent with a single bond.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%