“…Expansion of the chromophoric size of FHBC + C (l max = 460, 528, 664, 1261, and 1418 nm, e 1418 = 36 000 Lmol cm À1 )l eads to an increased molar absorptivity (by af actor of about 6) when compared to tBu HBC + C (l max = 550, 836, 1570, 1740, 2100 nm, e 2100 = 5700 Lmol À1 cm À1 ;S upporting Information, Figure S7). [6,17] Summarizing,w hile tBu HBC forms aggregates in neutral, excited, and radical cation states,a sj udged by,r espectively, broad NMR spectra, observation of excimeric emission (at about 560 nm), [6,17] and observation of intervalence transition (at 1200 nm) [6,17] in its radical cation spectrum in the presence of neutral tBu HBC ( Supporting Information, Figures S8,S9), such spectroscopic signatures of aggregation were completely absent in the case of FHBC.Acursory examination of the molecular structures of FHBC and tBu HBC suggests that the narrow bay areas in FHBC do not afford arrangement of two hexyl chains in as taggered (sandwich-like) dimer.O nt he other hand, the relatively wider bay areas in tBu HBC provide sufficient space for smaller methyl groups to be accommodated in as andwich-like (staggered) dimeric structure (Figure 5A).…”