2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10895-015-1705-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Evaluation of In Vitro DNA/Protein Binding Affinity, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Antitumor Activity of Mononuclear Ru(II) Mixed Polypyridyl Complexes

Abstract: The four novel Ru(II) complexes [Ru(phen)2MAFIP](2+) (1) [MAFIP = 2-(5-(methylacetate)furan-2-yl)-1 H-imidazo[4,5-f] [1, 10]phenanthroline, phen = 1,10-Phenanthroline], [Ru(bpy)2MAFIP](2+) (2) (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine) and [Ru(dmb)2MAFIP](2+) (3) (dmb = 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine) and [Ru(hdpa)2MAFIP](2+) (4) (hdpa = 2,2-dipyridylamine) have been synthesized and fully characterized via elemental analysis, NMR spectroscopy, EI-MS and FT-IR spectroscopy. In addition, the DNA-binding behaviors of the complexes 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the concentration of DNA increased, both absorption bands displayed clear hypochromism but no obvious red-shift. This observation is in agreement with recently published reports [63,64].…”
Section: Uv-vis Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 94%
“…As the concentration of DNA increased, both absorption bands displayed clear hypochromism but no obvious red-shift. This observation is in agreement with recently published reports [63,64].…”
Section: Uv-vis Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 94%
“…All in all, the difference in cellular toxicity between [1](PF 6 ) 2 on the one hand, and [2](PF 6 ) 2 and [3](PF 6 ) 2 on the other hand, probably come from other reasons than differences in cellular uptake. Clear differences of localization and/or toxicity have been observed in other published series of ruthenium polypyridyl complexes containing one or several dipyridylamine ancillary ligands [51,52]. Probably, [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(OH 2 )] 2+ is simply less cytotoxic than its i-biq and i-Hdiqa analogs [4] 2+ and [5] 2+ , because of different cellular localization and/or interaction with biomolecules, which remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Cytotoxicity and Cellular Uptakementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The zymograms were visualized and analyzed densitometrically.The results of the analysis were interpreted semi-quantitatively in arbitrary units (a.u.) of optic density compared to the control sample (men with HF without BPH) [11]. The level of galectin-3, CRP was determined by the method of immune-enzyme analysis with the commercial kit "AccuBind ELISA".…”
Section: Materials and Methods Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%