2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.05.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of [18F]2-(4-(4-(2-(2-fluoroethoxy)phenyl)piperazin-1-yl)butyl)-4-methyl-1,2,4-triazine-3,5(2H,4H)-dione ([18F]FECUMI-101) as an imaging probe for 5-HT1A receptor agonist in nonhuman primates

Abstract: The 5-HT1AR partial agonist PET radiotracer, [11C]CUMI-101, has advantages over an antagonist radiotracer as it binds preferentially to the high affinity state of the receptor and thereby provides more functionally meaningful information. The major drawback of C-11 tracers is the lack of cyclotron facility in many health care centers thereby limiting widespread clinical or research use. We identified the fluoroethyl derivative, 2-(4-(4-(2-(2-fluoroethoxy)phenyl)piperazin-1-yl)butyl)-4-methyl-1,2,4-triazine-3,5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

4
33
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22 The [ 18 F]FEOTs in turn was synthesized by a procedure previously reported by us. 23 Total synthesis and purification time required for the radiosynthesis was 50 min at EOS ( N = 6). The specific activity of the radioproduct was 1–2 Ci/μmol at EOS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The [ 18 F]FEOTs in turn was synthesized by a procedure previously reported by us. 23 Total synthesis and purification time required for the radiosynthesis was 50 min at EOS ( N = 6). The specific activity of the radioproduct was 1–2 Ci/μmol at EOS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in vivo PET imaging in baboon did not distinguish CA1 and DG subfields and only measured whole hippocampus. 16 In 16 These findings are in contrast to the parent ligand [ 3 H]CUMI-101 (5-HT 1A R K i = 0.15 nM; α 1 R K i = 6.5 nM), which shows high amounts of specific binding in 5-HT 1A R rich brain regions and no significant binding to α 1 R except for a small level of binding in DG. 13 The reason for why there is more binding of Figure 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…32 1,3,17 Receptor selectivity assays show that the highest affinity of FECUMI-101, apart from 5-HT 1A R (K i = 0.1 nM), is to 5-HT 7 R (K i = 17.2 nM), α 1A R (K i = 21.4 nM), and α 1B R (26.8 nM). 16 Both 5-HT 7 R and α 1 R are abundant in the thalamus, and α 1 R is coexpressed with 5-HT 1A R in many brain regions. 18−20 Since α 1 R antagonists are known to produce cardiovascular changes even at 0.01 mg/kg doses in monkeys, it is difficult to perform in vivo blocking experiments to test α 1A R selectivity of [ 18 F]1 in nonhuman primates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24, 25 We have recently identified several high affinity and selective 5-HT 1A R ligands as candidates for PET ligands. 2629 Of these [ 11 C]CUMI-101, is the only successful partial agonist PET tracer available so far for the in vivo measurement of high affinity 5-HT 1A R agonist binding in nonhuman primates and human subjects with PET. 26, 3033 The characteristic feature of the ligands we identified is the presence of a 3,5-dioxo-(2 H ,4 H )-1,2,4-triazine skeleton tethered to an arylpiperazine unit through a C-4 alkyl side chain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%