2004
DOI: 10.1002/macp.200400084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Micellization of Star‐Shaped Poly(ethylene glycol)‐block‐Poly(ε‐caprolactone)

Abstract: Summary: The relationship between the architecture of block copolymers and their micellar properties was investigated. Diblock, 3‐arm star‐shaped and 4‐arm star‐shaped block copolymers based on poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(ε‐caprolactone) were synthesized. Micelles of star‐shaped block copolymer in an aqueous solution were then prepared by a solvent evaporation method. The critical micelle concentration and the size of the micelles were measured by the steady‐state pyrene fluorescence method and dynamic ligh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
45
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…20 The mean hydrodynamic diameter of copolymer micelles was less than 50 nm, s-(PCL 5.1 -PEO 2.0 ) 4 micelles being larger than l-PCL 6.7 -(PEO 2.0 ) 2 micelles, while significant differences were not observed for polydispersity index. Micelle size for s-(PCL 5.1 -PEO 2.0 ) 4 was lower than that reported by Kim et al, 18 probably because of a different preparation procedure (nanoprecipitation vs. dialysis). The greater size of s-(PCL 5.1 -PEO 2.0 ) 4 micelles when compared with that of l-PCL 6.7 -(PEO) 2.0 micelles was interpreted on the basis of the schematic model proposed in Figure 3(C) and related to the effective length of PCL segments (L c ) upon self-assembly which is higher for s-(PCL 5.1 -PEO 2.0 ) 4 .…”
Section: Micelle Preparation and Characterizationcontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…20 The mean hydrodynamic diameter of copolymer micelles was less than 50 nm, s-(PCL 5.1 -PEO 2.0 ) 4 micelles being larger than l-PCL 6.7 -(PEO 2.0 ) 2 micelles, while significant differences were not observed for polydispersity index. Micelle size for s-(PCL 5.1 -PEO 2.0 ) 4 was lower than that reported by Kim et al, 18 probably because of a different preparation procedure (nanoprecipitation vs. dialysis). The greater size of s-(PCL 5.1 -PEO 2.0 ) 4 micelles when compared with that of l-PCL 6.7 -(PEO) 2.0 micelles was interpreted on the basis of the schematic model proposed in Figure 3(C) and related to the effective length of PCL segments (L c ) upon self-assembly which is higher for s-(PCL 5.1 -PEO 2.0 ) 4 .…”
Section: Micelle Preparation and Characterizationcontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Star-shaped block copolymers with a core consisting of hydrophobic inner branches and multiple hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) tails have been synthesized in the range of 3 to 32 by Wang et al [7,8], Zheng et al [9] and some other groups [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The unimers with arm numbers of 16 or 32 have shown the high stability, drug delivery efficacy and physicochemical properties compared to unimers with a smaller arm number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One paper (13) described the synthesis of a 4 arm star block copolymer of PCL and PEG using chemistry similar to that reported in this manuscript. Another report (14) described the preparation of a 4 arm star PCL-b-PEG polymer using a diethyl zinc catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%