2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-018-0057-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and microwave absorbing properties of CeO2/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the EAB max of 9.26 GHz is 1.32-18.52 times larger than those of CeO 2 /Ce(OH) 3 CSNFs (5.12 GHz) and other CeO 2 or CeO 2 -based composites (0.57.04 GHz). [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]46,47 (ii) Excellent low-frequency absorption. The narrow band for CeO 2 /Ce(OH) 3 CSNFs over 7.0-18.0 GHz (Fig.…”
Section: Microwave Absorption Properties and Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Notably, the EAB max of 9.26 GHz is 1.32-18.52 times larger than those of CeO 2 /Ce(OH) 3 CSNFs (5.12 GHz) and other CeO 2 or CeO 2 -based composites (0.57.04 GHz). [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]46,47 (ii) Excellent low-frequency absorption. The narrow band for CeO 2 /Ce(OH) 3 CSNFs over 7.0-18.0 GHz (Fig.…”
Section: Microwave Absorption Properties and Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matching thickness of 1.5-1.7 mm for Fe-doped CeO 2 /Ce(OH) 3 CSNFs is much smaller than those of CeO 2 /Ce(OH) 3 CSNFs (2.4 mm) and other cerium-based composites (2.0-7.8 mm). [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]46,47 According to the equation t m ¼ nc= 4f m ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi m r j j e r j j p À Á , 48 matching thickness varies inversely with frequency, permittivity, and permeability. Therefore, the smaller matching thickness of Fe-doped CeO 2 /Ce(OH) 3 CSNFs is ascribed to the incremental permeability and permittivity (Fig.…”
Section: Microwave Absorption Properties and Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference in the electrochemical performance between MPF-CeO 2 and MPF-C-CeO 2 is attributed to the synergistic interaction between the conductive species, carbon and CeO 2 , which introduces extra conductivity to the MPF (i.e., reduced impedance, confirmed by the EIS data as discussed later). Carbon and ceria can co-operatively increase the specific discharge capacity of the MPF, which is consistent with the findings of Wang et al, 42 who showed that the incorporation of CeO 2 nanoparticles onto the surface of carbon nanotubes leads to enhanced space charge polarization, interfacial polarization, and conductivity (reduced impedance) due to the supply of oxygen vacancies by the CeO 2 nanoparticles.…”
Section: Electrochemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%