2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and molecular docking studies of imines as α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ARG 600 is essential for α‐glucosidase activity (Ur Rehman et al., 2019). The binding energy of the peptides with α‐glucosidase (Table 5) was lower than that reported between acarbose and α‐glucosidase (−4.42 kcal/mol) (Aispuro‐Pérez et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…ARG 600 is essential for α‐glucosidase activity (Ur Rehman et al., 2019). The binding energy of the peptides with α‐glucosidase (Table 5) was lower than that reported between acarbose and α‐glucosidase (−4.42 kcal/mol) (Aispuro‐Pérez et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…[33] Silicon method Molecular docking is a method used to predict the binding site and affinity of small ligand molecules at receptor macromolecular binding sites . [34][35][36][37] The docking process mainly involves spatial and energy matching between the ligand and the receptor to obtain the best conformation, and focuses on their compatibility. Molecular docking can also be used in the screening of αamylase inhibitors to determine whether the small inhibitors have an effect on amylase.…”
Section: Quick Determination Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the derivative 12i was witnessed as the most potent inhibitor of α-glucosidase enzymes as described above; herein, this derivative also proved the most effective inhibitor of α-amylase enzyme, having the lowest IC 50 value (7.52 µM) of all other derivatives and about 2.5-fold smaller than the standard drug, acarbose. This derivative 12i was also found to be a better α-amylase inhibitor as compared to the previously reported nicotinic acid derivatives [75], aryl imines [76], phosphoramidates [77] and piperazine sulfonamide analogs [45]. Moreover, the derivatives 12e and 12f also demonstrated good inhibitory potential against α-amylase, having IC 50 values of 37.5 and 28.97 µM, respectively.…”
Section: α-Amylase Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 58%