“…The hydride resonance of the major species displays a significant upfield shift (7.52 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 398 Hz) in comparison to related Yb(II) hydride derivatives such as the (THF)-coordinated, [BDI Dipp YbH(THF)] 2 (9.92 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 369 Hz) 31 , and the tris(pyrazolyl)borate derivative, [{(Tp tBu,Me ) YbH} 2 ] (Tp tBu,Me = [HB(3-tBu-5-Me-C 3 N 2 ) 3 ] -) (10.5 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 369 Hz) 34 . The low frequency of this hydride resonance is, however, closely comparable with that of [{[t-BuC(NDipp) 2 ]Yb(μ-H)} 2 ] (7.74 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 460 Hz), in which the amidinate ligands are bound to each Yb(II) centre via a κ 1 -N,η 6 -Dipp chelate and which display a similar arene interaction 29 . Based on this precedent, therefore, we ascribe the major species observed in the solution spectra of 2 to reflect a similar augmentation of the electron density at Yb and the maintenance of the polyhapto engagement of the aromatic π-system observed in its solid-state structure 35 .…”