2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11172-018-2092-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and molecular structures of YbII and Ca bis(amidinate) complexes containing the tridentate amidinate ligand [2,6-Pri2C6H3NC(But)NC6H4OMe-2]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydride resonance of the major species displays a significant upfield shift (7.52 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 398 Hz) in comparison to related Yb(II) hydride derivatives such as the (THF)-coordinated, [BDI Dipp YbH(THF)] 2 (9.92 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 369 Hz) 31 , and the tris(pyrazolyl)borate derivative, [{(Tp tBu,Me ) YbH} 2 ] (Tp tBu,Me = [HB(3-tBu-5-Me-C 3 N 2 ) 3 ] -) (10.5 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 369 Hz) 34 . The low frequency of this hydride resonance is, however, closely comparable with that of [{[t-BuC(NDipp) 2 ]Yb(μ-H)} 2 ] (7.74 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 460 Hz), in which the amidinate ligands are bound to each Yb(II) centre via a κ 1 -N,η 6 -Dipp chelate and which display a similar arene interaction 29 . Based on this precedent, therefore, we ascribe the major species observed in the solution spectra of 2 to reflect a similar augmentation of the electron density at Yb and the maintenance of the polyhapto engagement of the aromatic π-system observed in its solid-state structure 35 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hydride resonance of the major species displays a significant upfield shift (7.52 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 398 Hz) in comparison to related Yb(II) hydride derivatives such as the (THF)-coordinated, [BDI Dipp YbH(THF)] 2 (9.92 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 369 Hz) 31 , and the tris(pyrazolyl)borate derivative, [{(Tp tBu,Me ) YbH} 2 ] (Tp tBu,Me = [HB(3-tBu-5-Me-C 3 N 2 ) 3 ] -) (10.5 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 369 Hz) 34 . The low frequency of this hydride resonance is, however, closely comparable with that of [{[t-BuC(NDipp) 2 ]Yb(μ-H)} 2 ] (7.74 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 460 Hz), in which the amidinate ligands are bound to each Yb(II) centre via a κ 1 -N,η 6 -Dipp chelate and which display a similar arene interaction 29 . Based on this precedent, therefore, we ascribe the major species observed in the solution spectra of 2 to reflect a similar augmentation of the electron density at Yb and the maintenance of the polyhapto engagement of the aromatic π-system observed in its solid-state structure 35 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Each Yb(II) centre binds to the β-diketiminato-N atoms and interacts in a η 6 -coordination mode (Yb1-Ar cent 2.7099(9) Å) with a Dipp substituent of a second BDI-Dipp YbH unit of the dimer. The η 6 -coordination of 2 is significantly weaker than in other ytterbium(II) complexes with a Yb(II) κ 1 -N, η 6 -Dipp chelate (2.424-2.520 Å) [28][29][30] , suggesting that the solidstate structure may not be retained in solution. This geometry contrasts significantly with both of the related dimeric (THF)coordinated complexes, [BDI Dipp MH(THF)] 2 (M = Yb or Ca) [31][32][33] , and the solvent-free calcium analogue, [BDI Dipp CaH] 2 6 , in which the μ 2 -hydride ligands provide the sole bridging interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The hydride resonance of the major species displays a significant upfield shift (7.52 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 398 Hz) in comparison to related Yb(II) hydride derivatives such as the (THF)-coordinated, [BDI Dipp YbH(THF)] 2 (9.92 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 369 Hz) 31 , and the tris(pyrazolyl)borate derivative, [{(Tp tBu,Me ) YbH} 2 ] (Tp tBu,Me = [HB(3-tBu-5-Me-C 3 N 2 ) 3 ] -) (10.5 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 369 Hz) 34 . The low frequency of this hydride resonance is, however, closely comparable with that of [{[t-BuC(NDipp) 2 ]Yb(μ-H)} 2 ] (7.74 ppm, 1 J Yb-H = 460 Hz), in which the amidinate ligands are bound to each Yb(II) centre via a κ 1 -N,η 6 -Dipp chelate and which display a similar arene interaction 29 . Based on this precedent, therefore, we ascribe the major species observed in the solution spectra of 2 to reflect a similar augmentation of the electron density at Yb and the maintenance of the polyhapto engagement of the aromatic π-system observed in its solid-state structure 35 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Each Yb(II) centre binds to the β-diketiminato-N atoms and interacts in a η 6 -coordination mode (Yb1-Ar cent 2.7099(9) Å) with a Dipp substituent of a second BDI-Dipp YbH unit of the dimer. The η 6 -coordination of 2 is significantly weaker than in other ytterbium(II) complexes with a Yb(II) κ 1 -N, η 6 -Dipp chelate (2.424-2.520 Å) [28][29][30] , suggesting that the solidstate structure may not be retained in solution. This geometry contrasts significantly with both of the related dimeric (THF)coordinated complexes, [BDI Dipp MH(THF)] 2 (M = Yb or Ca) [31][32][33] , and the solvent-free calcium analogue, [BDI Dipp CaH] 2 6 , in which the μ 2 -hydride ligands provide the sole bridging interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%