1990
DOI: 10.1039/p19900000333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and properties of methanothia-[15]-, -[17]-, -[19]-, -[21]-, -[23]-, -[25]-, -[27]-, -[29]-annulene and dimethanodithia-[26]- and -[30]-annulene

Abstract: ChemInform Abstract Title compounds such as (III) and (IV) are prepared via double Wittig reaction of the dicarbaldehydes (I). Some of these polyenes exist as sole isomers; the geometries of the double bonds can be determined by NMR. In other cases E,Z-mixtures are obtained. The 1H NMR spectra show that the methanothia-(17)-, -(19)-, -(23)-, and -(27)-annulenes sustain ring current, while the remaining title compounds do not. Dynamic NMR analysis of the methylene protons reveals the flipping of the methylene b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Kato's annulene 5 , the annulene form is stable, but diatropicity conclusions based on coupling constant data suggested the compound had little aromaticity. Sondheimer's thia[13]annulene 6 , and Ojima's series 7 ( n = 2−4) and 8 ( n = 2−4, m = n + 1) appear to be diatropic, though not strongly. In these cases, despite their elegant syntheses, it is difficult to calibrate the aromaticity because of anisotropy effects, conformational mobility, or just plain lack of a good comparison parent annulene, particularly one with the same geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Kato's annulene 5 , the annulene form is stable, but diatropicity conclusions based on coupling constant data suggested the compound had little aromaticity. Sondheimer's thia[13]annulene 6 , and Ojima's series 7 ( n = 2−4) and 8 ( n = 2−4, m = n + 1) appear to be diatropic, though not strongly. In these cases, despite their elegant syntheses, it is difficult to calibrate the aromaticity because of anisotropy effects, conformational mobility, or just plain lack of a good comparison parent annulene, particularly one with the same geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1 H, d, J 14) and 2.037 (1 H, d, J 12.7): 6,(75.47 MHz) 133.96 (t), 132.92 (t), 132.67 (t), 132.52 (t), 131.44 (q), 131.18 (q), 130.19 (t), 130.14 (t), 129.72 (t), 129.62 (t), 127.67 (t), 127.64 (t), 127.53(t), 126.1 1 (t), 125.57 109.41 (q), 84.34 (4, -G), 83.69 (4, -G), 71.59 (9, -Cz), 71.22(t), 124.69(t), 113.87 (q), 113.76(9). 85.80 (q, -G ) , 85.01(9, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%